Author: Bugter, I. A. L.; Janssen, L. C. E.; Dieleman, J.; Kramer, B. W.; Andriessen, P.; Niemarkt, H. J.
Title: Introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), impact on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in early life: a historical cohort study Cord-id: aqrd12vm Document date: 2020_9_3
ID: aqrd12vm
Snippet: BACKGROUND: In preterm infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) has been established to reduce the need of mechanical ventilation and might improve survival rates without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NICU care has changed after introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), with regard to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life. METHODS: Infants with ge
Document: BACKGROUND: In preterm infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) has been established to reduce the need of mechanical ventilation and might improve survival rates without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NICU care has changed after introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), with regard to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life. METHODS: Infants with gestational age < 32 weeks who received surfactant by LISA (June 2014 – December 2017, n = 169) were retrospectively compared to infants who received surfactant after intubation (January 2012 – May 2014, n = 155). Local protocols on indication for surfactant, early onset sepsis, blood transfusions and enteral feeding did not change between both study periods. Besides, as secondary outcome complications of prematurity were compared. Data was collected from electronic patient files and compared by univariate analysis through Students T-test, Mann Whitney-U test, Pearson Chi-Square test or Linear by Linear Association. RESULTS: All baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Compared to controls, LISA patients received a higher total surfactant dose (208 vs.160 mg/kg; p < 0.001), required redosing more frequently (32.5% vs. 21.3%; p = 0.023), but needed less mechanical ventilation (35.5% vs. 76.8%; p < 0.001). After LISA, infants underwent fewer X-rays (1.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001), blood gas examinations (3.0 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), less inotropic drugs (9.5% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.024), blood transfusions (24.9% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.003) and had shorter duration of antibiotic therapy for suspected early onset sepsis (3.0 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.001). Moreover, enteral feeding was advanced faster (120 vs. 100 mL/kg/d, p = 0.048) at day seven. There were no differences in complications of prematurity. CONCLUSION: The introduction of LISA is associated with significantly fewer diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life, which emphasizes the beneficial effects of LISA.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal surgery and absolute number: 1
- abdominal surgery and local protocol: 1
- abdominal surgery and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- abdominal surgery and low incidence: 1
- abdominal surgery and low threshold: 1
- absolute day and loading dose: 1, 2
- absolute number and low incidence: 1
- absolute number and low threshold: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date