Selected article for: "improve response and overall mortality"

Author: Pasin, Laura; Cavalli, Giulio; Navalesi, Paolo; Sella, Nicolò; Landoni, Giovanni; Yavorovskiy, Andrey G.; Likhvantsev, Valery V.; Zangrillo, Alberto; Dagna, Lorenzo; Monti, Giacomo
Title: Anakinra for patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies.
  • Cord-id: bqlam80s
  • Document date: 2021_2_5
  • ID: bqlam80s
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: : Severe COVID-19 cases have a detrimental hyper-inflammatory host response and different cytokine-blocking biologic agents were explored to improve outcomes. Anakinra blocks the activity of both IL-1α and IL‑1β and is approved for different autoinflammatory disorders, but it is used off-label for conditions characterized by an excess of cytokine production. Several studies on anakinra in COVID-19 patients reported positive effects. We performed a meta-analysis of all published
    Document: INTRODUCTION: : Severe COVID-19 cases have a detrimental hyper-inflammatory host response and different cytokine-blocking biologic agents were explored to improve outcomes. Anakinra blocks the activity of both IL-1α and IL‑1β and is approved for different autoinflammatory disorders, but it is used off-label for conditions characterized by an excess of cytokine production. Several studies on anakinra in COVID-19 patients reported positive effects. We performed a meta-analysis of all published evidence on the use of anakinra in COVID19 to investigate its effect on survival and need for mechanical ventilation. METHODS: : We searched for any study performed on adult patients with acute hypoxemic failure related to 2019-nCoV infection, receiving anakinra versus any comparator. Primary endpoint was mortality at the longest available follow-up. Adverse effects, need for mechanical ventilation and discharge at home with no limitations were also analysed. RESULTS: : Four observational studies involving 184 patients were included. Overall mortality of patients treated with anakinra was significantly lower than mortality in the control group (95% CI 0.14-0.48, p<0.0001). Moreover, patients treated with anakinra had a significantly lower risk of need for mechanical ventilation than controls (95% CI 0.250.74, p=0.002). No difference in adverse events and discharge at home with no limitations was observed. The Trial Sequential Analysis z-cumulative line reached the monitoring boundary for benefit and the required sample size. CONCLUSIONS: : Administration of anakinra in COVID-19 patients was safe and might be associated with reductions in both mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and additional study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjustment lack: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and administration time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and administration time dose: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and administration timing: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low mortality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • additional study and administration time: 1
    • additional study and administration timing: 1
    • additional study and low mortality: 1, 2, 3
    • long available and low mortality: 1, 2, 3