Selected article for: "cumulative incidence and observed value"

Author: Zaixing Shi; Ya Fang
Title: Temporal relationship between outbound traffic from Wuhan and the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) incidence in China
  • Document date: 2020_3_17
  • ID: hrrzztt5_32
    Snippet: The optimal ARIMAX models for each province cluster are summarized in Table 1 . The ARIMA (2,1,0) was optimal for provinces with <1 week of lag, and the ARIMA (1,1,0) was optimal for provinces with ≥1 week of lag. The model-predicted cumulative incidence based on actual traffic data demonstrated good fit with the observed incidences ( Figure 4A -4C, Table 1 ). The predicted cumulative incidences would be higher in all three clusters of province.....
    Document: The optimal ARIMAX models for each province cluster are summarized in Table 1 . The ARIMA (2,1,0) was optimal for provinces with <1 week of lag, and the ARIMA (1,1,0) was optimal for provinces with ≥1 week of lag. The model-predicted cumulative incidence based on actual traffic data demonstrated good fit with the observed incidences ( Figure 4A -4C, Table 1 ). The predicted cumulative incidences would be higher in all three clusters of provinces based on 2019 traffic data ( Figure 4D-4F) , and the differences were projected to grow larger moving forward. It is estimated that there would be approximately 2,123 more cases in provinces with <1 week lag, 4,363 more in provinces with 1 week of lag, and 13,282 more in provinces with 2-3 weeks of lag by the end of February, although the predicted value was not significantly different from the observed in provinces with <1 week of lag (Table 1) . We estimated that the travel ban may have reduced a total of 19,768 (95% CI: 13,589, 25,946) cases outside of Wuhan by the end of February.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • ARIMAX model and February end: 1
    • ARIMAX model and model predict: 1
    • cumulative incidence and February end: 1, 2
    • cumulative incidence and lag week: 1
    • cumulative incidence and large grow: 1
    • cumulative incidence and model predict: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • cumulative incidence and observe incidence: 1, 2
    • cumulative incidence and predict cumulative incidence: 1, 2
    • February end and good fit: 1
    • February end and lag week: 1
    • February end and model predict: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • good fit and model predict: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9