Selected article for: "constructed network and model constructed network"

Author: Li, Xiaoran; Ge, Peilin; Zhu, Jocelyn; Li, Haifang; Graham, James; Singer, Adam; Richman, Paul S.; Duong, Tim Q.
Title: Deep learning prediction of likelihood of ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients using clinical variables
  • Cord-id: gdhz7mr4
  • Document date: 2020_11_6
  • ID: gdhz7mr4
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a deep-learning model and a risk-score system using clinical variables to predict intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 5,766 persons-under-investigation for COVID-19 between 7 February 2020 and 4 May 2020. Demographics, chronic comorbidities, vital signs, symptoms and laboratory tests at admission were collected. A deep neural network model and a risk-score system
    Document: BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop a deep-learning model and a risk-score system using clinical variables to predict intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 5,766 persons-under-investigation for COVID-19 between 7 February 2020 and 4 May 2020. Demographics, chronic comorbidities, vital signs, symptoms and laboratory tests at admission were collected. A deep neural network model and a risk-score system were constructed to predict ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. Prediction performance used the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The top ICU predictors were procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, ferritin and oxygen saturation. The top mortality predictors were age, lactate dehydrogenase, procalcitonin, cardiac troponin, C-reactive protein and oxygen saturation. Age and troponin were unique top predictors for mortality but not ICU admission. The deep-learning model predicted ICU admission and mortality with an AUC of 0.780 (95% CI [0.760–0.785]) and 0.844 (95% CI [0.839–0.848]), respectively. The corresponding risk scores yielded an AUC of 0.728 (95% CI [0.726–0.729]) and 0.848 (95% CI [0.847–0.849]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning and the resultant risk score have the potential to provide frontline physicians with quantitative tools to stratify patients more effectively in time-sensitive and resource-constrained circumstances.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal chest and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • abnormal chest and admission age: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • abnormal chest and admission group: 1, 2
    • abnormal chest and admission level: 1
    • abnormal chest and admission patient: 1, 2, 3
    • abnormal chest and admission rate: 1, 2, 3
    • abnormal chest and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • academic hospital and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • academic hospital and admission age: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • academic hospital and admission group: 1
    • academic hospital and admission level: 1, 2, 3
    • academic hospital and admission patient: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • academic hospital and admission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • academic hospital and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and additive model: 1, 2
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission age: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14