Author: Kurdi, Amanj; Abutheraa, Nouf; Akil, Lina; Godman, Brian
Title: A systematic review and metaâ€analysis of the use of reninâ€angiotensin system drugs and COVIDâ€19 clinical outcomes: What is the evidence so far? Cord-id: gea5229c Document date: 2020_10_20
ID: gea5229c
Snippet: Conflicting evidence exists about the effect of angiotensinâ€converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVIDâ€19 clinical outcomes. We aimed to provide a comprehensive/updated evaluation of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVIDâ€19â€related clinical outcomes, including exploration of interclass differences between ACEIs and ARBs, using a systematic review/metaâ€analysis approach conducted in Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, and medRxiv from in
Document: Conflicting evidence exists about the effect of angiotensinâ€converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVIDâ€19 clinical outcomes. We aimed to provide a comprehensive/updated evaluation of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVIDâ€19â€related clinical outcomes, including exploration of interclass differences between ACEIs and ARBs, using a systematic review/metaâ€analysis approach conducted in Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, and medRxiv from inception to 22 May 2020. English studies that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs among patients with COVIDâ€19 were included. Studies’ quality was appraised using the Newcastleâ€Ottawa Scale. Data were analyzed using the randomâ€effects modeling stratified by exposure (ACEIs/ARBs, ACEIs, and ARBs). Heterogeneiity was assessed using I(2) statistic. Several subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of potential confounders. Overall, 27 studies were eligible. The pooled analyses showed nonsignificant associations between ACEIs/ARBs and death (OR:0.97, 95%CI:0.75,1.27), ICU admission (OR:1.09;95%CI:0.65,1.81), death/ICU admission (OR:0.67; 95%CI:0.52,0.86), risk of COVIDâ€19 infection (OR:1.01; 95%CI:0.93,1.10), severe infection (OR:0.78; 95%CI:0.53,1.15), and hospitalization (OR:1.15; 95%CI:0.81,1.65). However, the subgroup analyses indicated significant association between ACEIs/ARBs and hospitalization among USA studies (OR:1.59; 95%CI:1.03,2.44), peerâ€reviewed (OR:1.93, 95%CI:1.38,2.71), good quality and studies which reported adjusted measure of effect (OR:1.30, 95%CI:1.10,1.50). Significant differences were found between ACEIs and ARBs with the latter being significantly associated with lower risk of acquiring COVIDâ€19 infection (OR:0.24; 95%CI: 0.17,0.34). In conclusion, highâ€quality evidence exists for the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on some COVIDâ€19 clinical outcomes. For the first time, we provided evidence, albeit of low quality, on interclass differences between ACEIs and ARBs for some of the reported clinical outcomes.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abstract screen and low quality: 1, 2
- abstract screen and low quality evidence: 1
- aceis arbs and adjusted analysis: 1, 2
- aceis arbs and lopinavir hydroxychloroquine: 1, 2
- aceis arbs and low quality: 1
- address help and low duration: 1
- address help and low quality: 1
- adjusted analysis and lopinavir hydroxychloroquine: 1
- adjusted analysis and low infection: 1, 2, 3, 4
- adjusted analysis and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- adjusted analysis and low quality evidence: 1
- lopinavir hydroxychloroquine and low infection: 1, 2
- lopinavir hydroxychloroquine and low quality: 1, 2, 3
- lopinavir hydroxychloroquine and low quality evidence: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date