Selected article for: "entire population and patient entire population"

Author: Xu, Gang; Emanuel, Anthony J; Nadig, Satish; Mehrotra, Shikhar; Caddell, Brittany A; Curry, Scott R; Nolte, Frederick S; Babic, Nikolina
Title: Evaluation of Orthogonal Testing Algorithm for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies
  • Cord-id: hk3mcsf7
  • Document date: 2020_9_7
  • ID: hk3mcsf7
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing is an important tool in assessment of pandemic progress, contact tracing, and identification of recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We evaluated an orthogonal testing algorithm (OTA) to improve test specificity in these use cases. METHODS: A two-step OTA was applied where individuals who initially tested positive were tested with a second test. The first-line test, detecting IgG antibodi
    Document: BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody testing is an important tool in assessment of pandemic progress, contact tracing, and identification of recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We evaluated an orthogonal testing algorithm (OTA) to improve test specificity in these use cases. METHODS: A two-step OTA was applied where individuals who initially tested positive were tested with a second test. The first-line test, detecting IgG antibodies to the viral nucleocapsid protein was validated in 130 samples and the second-line test, detecting IgG antibodies to the viral spike protein in 148 samples. The OTA was evaluated in 4,333 clinical patient specimens. The seropositivity rates relative to the SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rates were evaluated from our entire patient population data (n = 5,102). RESULTS: The first-line test resulted in a clinical sensitivity of 96.4% (95% CI; 82.3% to 99.4%), and specificity of 99.0% (95% CI; 94.7% to 99.8%), whereas the second-line test had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI; 87.7% to 100%) and specificity of 98.4% (95% CI; 94.2% to 99.5%). Using the OTA, 78/98 (80%) of initially positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG results were confirmed with a second-line test, while 11/42 (26%) of previously diagnosed COVID-19 patients had no detectable antibodies as long as 94 days post PCR diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our results show that an OTA can be used to identify patients who require further follow-up due to potential SARS CoV-2 IgG false positive results. In addition, serological testing may not be sufficiently sensitive to reliably detect prior COVID-19 infection.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abbott sars and acid amplification test: 1, 2, 3
    • abbott sars and low disease: 1
    • abbott sars and low disease prevalence: 1
    • abbott sars and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • abbott sars and low prevalence population: 1, 2
    • abbott sars igg and acid amplification test: 1, 2
    • abbott sars igg and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • abbott sars igg and low prevalence population: 1, 2
    • abbott sars igg assay and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abbott sars igg assay and low prevalence population: 1, 2
    • abbott test and acid amplification test: 1
    • abbott test and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acid amplification test and low burden: 1
    • additional follow and low disease: 1
    • additional follow and low prevalence: 1