Author: Zajac, Jenna A; Cavanaugh, James T; Baker, Teresa; Colón-Semenza, Cristina; DeAngelis, Tamara R; Duncan, Ryan P; Fulford, Daniel; LaValley, Michael; Nordahl, Timothy; Rawson, Kerri S; Saint-Hilaire, Marie; Thomas, Cathi A; Earhart, Gammon M; Ellis, Terry D
Title: Are Mobile Persons With Parkinson Disease Necessarily More Active? Cord-id: idg9f2ne Document date: 2021_6_3
ID: idg9f2ne
Snippet: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Walking activity in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) is important for preventing functional decline. The contribution of walking activity to home and community mobility in PD is poorly understood. METHODS Cross-sectional baseline data (N = 69) were analyzed from a randomized controlled PD trial. The Life-Space Assessment (LSA) quantified the extent, frequency, and independence across 5 expanding levels of home and community mobility, producing individual subscores and a
Document: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Walking activity in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) is important for preventing functional decline. The contribution of walking activity to home and community mobility in PD is poorly understood. METHODS Cross-sectional baseline data (N = 69) were analyzed from a randomized controlled PD trial. The Life-Space Assessment (LSA) quantified the extent, frequency, and independence across 5 expanding levels of home and community mobility, producing individual subscores and a total score. Two additional summed scores were used to represent mobility within (Levels 1-3) and beyond (Levels 4-5) neighborhood limits. An accelerometer measured walking activity for 7 days. Regression and correlation analyses evaluated relationships between daily steps and mobility scores. Mann-Whitney U tests secondarily compared differences in mobility scores between the active and sedentary groups. RESULTS Walking activity contributed significantly to the summed Level 1-3 score (β = 0.001, P = 0.004) but not to the summed Level 4-5 (β = 0.001, P = 0.33) or total (β = 0.002, P = 0.07) scores. Walking activity was significantly related to Level 1 (Ï = 0.336, P = 0.005), Level 2 (Ï = 0.307, P = 0.010), and Level 3 (Ï = 0.314, P = 0.009) subscores. Only the summed Level 1-3 score (P = 0.030) was significantly different between the active and sedentary groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Persons with PD who demonstrated greater mobility beyond the neighborhood were not necessarily more active; walking activity contributed more so to home and neighborhood mobility. Compared with LSA total score, the Level 1-3 summed score may be a more useful participation-level measure for assessing the impact of changes in walking activity. VIDEO ABSTRACT AVAILABLE For more insight from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1 (available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A349).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date