Author: Solomon Hsiang; Daniel Allen; Sebastien Annan-Phan; Kendon Bell; Ian Bolliger; Trinetta Chong; Hannah Druckenmiller; Andrew Hultgren; Luna Yue Huang; Emma Krasovich; Peiley Lau; Jaecheol Lee; Esther Rolf; Jeanette Tseng; Tiffany Wu
Title: The Effect of Large-Scale Anti-Contagion Policies on the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Document date: 2020_3_27
ID: gtfx5cp4_192
Snippet: As the number of cases grew, the Iranian government started to increase the stringency of its response. The first case was reported on February 19, 2020 (two individuals who both were reported to have died that day). The next day, school closures were announced in the province of Qom and travel in the region was discouraged. By February 22, 2020 the government closed schools in 14 provinces and closed down major gathering sites such as football m.....
Document: As the number of cases grew, the Iranian government started to increase the stringency of its response. The first case was reported on February 19, 2020 (two individuals who both were reported to have died that day). The next day, school closures were announced in the province of Qom and travel in the region was discouraged. By February 22, 2020 the government closed schools in 14 provinces and closed down major gathering sites such as football matches and theaters. By March 5, 2020 schools were closed nationwide and government employees were required to work from home. Home isolation was implemented by the military on March 13, 2020, which the media described as "the near-curfew follows growing exasperation among MPs that calls for Iranian citizens to stay at home had been widely ignored, as people continued to travel before the Nowruz New Year holidays." 104 United States For the United States' policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we relied on a number of sources, including the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC), individual state health departments, as well as various press releases from county and city-level government or media outlets. The CDC has posted and continually updated a Community Mitigation Framework that encompasses both mandatory and recommended policies at a national level. This framework was interpreted by individual states as 105 106 they each declared their own States of Emergency at various dates, and subsequently released their own community mitigation plans. Some of the first states to release such plans include Massachusetts, California, Florida, Washington, and New York. Each respective Community 107 Mitigation Framework included both mandatory and optional policies to prevent the COVID-19 spread. In addition to both national and federal level policies and recommendations, cities and counties have also taken on the role of providing guidance and implementing policies to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- case number and community mitigation: 1
- case number and county city: 1
- case number and day die: 1
- case number and emergency state: 1, 2
- case number and emergency state declare: 1
- case number and guidance provide: 1, 2, 3
- case number and health department: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- case number and home isolation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- case number and home stay: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- case number and home work: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- case number and individual state: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- case number and national level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- case number and policy implement: 1
- case number and policy response: 1, 2
- case number and response stringency: 1, 2
- case number and school closure: 1, 2, 3, 4
- case number and source number: 1, 2, 3
- case number and spread mitigate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- case number and spread prevent: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date