Author: Zhou, J.; Ma, Yi; Liu, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Tao, C.; Yu, H.; Huang, J.
Title: A Correlation Analysis Between the Nutritional Status and Prognosis of COVID-19 Patients Cord-id: kyqhiewa Document date: 2020_8_10
ID: kyqhiewa
Snippet: PURPOSE: The present study investigated the correlation between the nutritional status and prognosis of COVID-19 patients, and analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 patients with different nutritional status. METHODS: 429 patients who were diagnosed positive for COVTD-19 in Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from December 2019 to March 2020 were selected and divided into different groups based on Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score (0–4: the l
Document: PURPOSE: The present study investigated the correlation between the nutritional status and prognosis of COVID-19 patients, and analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 patients with different nutritional status. METHODS: 429 patients who were diagnosed positive for COVTD-19 in Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from December 2019 to March 2020 were selected and divided into different groups based on Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score (0–4: the low CONUT score group; 5–12: the high CONUT score group). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate the effects of CONUT score on prognosis. RESULTS: The total score of admission status of patients with higher CONUT score was higher than that of those with lower CONUT score (χ(2) = 7.152, P = 0.007). The number of adverse outcomes of female was higher than that of male (χ(2) = 10.253, P = 0.001). The number of adverse outcomes was higher for patients with smoking history (P = 0.004) or hypertension (χ(2) = 11.240, P = 0.001) than those without. Also, the number of adverse outcomes was higher for older patients than younger ones (χ(2) = 15.681, P < 0.001). Patients with adverse outcomes had lower urine red blood cell count than patients without adverse outcomes (χ(2) = 5.029, P = 0.025). However, BMI, drinking history and diabetes did not show correlation with the prognosis of COVID-19 (P > 0.05). Among patients ≥ 61 years old, the risk of adverse outcomes in the high CONUT score group was 6.191 times that of the low CONUT score group (OR = 6.191, 95% CI: 1.431–26.785). Among the non-diabetic patients, the risk of adverse outcomes in the high CONUT group was 11.678 times that of the low CONUT group (OR = 11.678, 95% CI: 2.754–49.41). For the patients who had a total score of admission status < 6, the risk of adverse outcomes in the high CONUT score group was 8.216 times that of the low CONUT score group (OR = 8.216, 95% CI: 2.439–27.682). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with good nutritional status showed a small chance to have adverse outcomes. Gender, age, hypertension, the number of urine red blood cell count and CONUT score affected the adverse outcomes of patients.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute hemorrhage and admission status: 1
- acute hemorrhage and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute hemorrhage and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- acute hemorrhage respiratory failure and logistic regression: 1
- acute hemorrhage respiratory failure and logistic regression analysis: 1
- admission status and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission status and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- admission status and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- liver cell and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- liver cell and logistic regression analysis: 1
- liver cell and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression analysis and low peripheral blood: 1, 2
- logistic regression analysis and low peripheral blood lymphocyte count: 1
- logistic regression analysis and low score high score: 1
- logistic regression and low peripheral blood: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- logistic regression and low peripheral blood lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and low score high score: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and low score high score group: 1
- logistic regression and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date