Author: Mashayekhi, Rabab; Pavlovic, Radenko; Racine, Jacinthe; Moran, Michael D.; Manseau, Patrick M.; Duhamel, Annie; Katal, Ali; Miville, Jessica; Niemi, David; Peng, Si Jun; Sassi, Mourad; Griffin, Debora; McLinden, Chris Anthony
Title: Isolating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on urban air quality in Canada Cord-id: lswvw426 Document date: 2021_5_18
ID: lswvw426
Snippet: We have investigated the impact of reduced emissions due to COVID-19 lockdown measures in spring 2020 on air quality in Canada’s four largest cities: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Calgary. Observed daily concentrations of NO(2), PM(2.5), and O(3) during a “pre-lockdown†period (15 February–14 March 2020) and a “lockdown†period (22 March–2 May 2020), when lockdown measures were in full force everywhere in Canada, were compared to the same periods in the previous decade (2010–
Document: We have investigated the impact of reduced emissions due to COVID-19 lockdown measures in spring 2020 on air quality in Canada’s four largest cities: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Calgary. Observed daily concentrations of NO(2), PM(2.5), and O(3) during a “pre-lockdown†period (15 February–14 March 2020) and a “lockdown†period (22 March–2 May 2020), when lockdown measures were in full force everywhere in Canada, were compared to the same periods in the previous decade (2010–2019). Higher-than-usual seasonal declines in mean daily NO(2) were observed for the pre-lockdown to lockdown periods in 2020. For PM(2.5), Montreal was the only city with a higher-than-usual seasonal decline, whereas for O(3) all four cities remained within the previous decadal range. In order to isolate the impact of lockdown-related emission changes from other factors such as seasonal changes in meteorology and emissions and meteorological variability, two emission scenarios were performed with the GEM-MACH air quality model. The first was a Business-As-Usual (BAU) scenario with baseline emissions and the second was a more realistic simulation with estimated COVID-19 lockdown emissions. NO(2) surface concentrations for the COVID-19 emission scenario decreased by 31 to 34% on average relative to the BAU scenario in the four metropolitan areas. Lower decreases ranging from 6 to 17% were predicted for PM(2.5). O(3) surface concentrations, on the other hand, showed increases up to a maximum of 21% close to city centers versus slight decreases over the suburbs, but O(x) (odd oxygen), like NO(2) and PM(2.5), decreased as expected over these cities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11869-021-01039-1.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- activity level and lockdown impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- activity level and lockdown lockdown: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- activity level and lockdown lockdown period: 1
- activity level and lockdown model: 1
- activity level and lockdown partial: 1
- activity level and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- activity level and lockdown pre: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- activity level and lockdown transition: 1
- activity reduction and additional reduction: 1, 2, 3
- activity reduction and local air quality: 1
- activity reduction and lockdown impact: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- activity reduction and lockdown lockdown: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- activity reduction and lockdown mean: 1, 2
- activity reduction and lockdown model: 1
- activity reduction and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date