Selected article for: "CT characteristic and disease severity"

Author: Pal, Aman; Ali, Abulhassan; Young, Timothy R; Oostenbrink, Juan; Prabhakar, Akul; Prabhakar, Amogh; Deacon, Nina; Arnold, Amar; Eltayeb, Ahmed; Yap, Charles; Young, David M; Tang, Alan; Lakshmanan, Subramanian; Lim, Ying Yi; Pokarowski, Martha; Kakodkar, Pramath
Title: Comprehensive literature review on the radiographic findings, imaging modalities, and the role of radiology in the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Cord-id: mii8q32p
  • Document date: 2021_9_28
  • ID: mii8q32p
    Snippet: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, over 103214008 cases have been reported, with more than 2231158 deaths as of January 31, 2021. Although the gold standard for diagnosis of this disease remains the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs, its false-negative rates have ignited the use of medical imaging as an important adjunct or alternative. Medical imaging assists in identifying the pathogenesis, the degree
    Document: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, over 103214008 cases have been reported, with more than 2231158 deaths as of January 31, 2021. Although the gold standard for diagnosis of this disease remains the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs, its false-negative rates have ignited the use of medical imaging as an important adjunct or alternative. Medical imaging assists in identifying the pathogenesis, the degree of pulmonary damage, and the characteristic features in each imaging modality. This literature review collates the characteristic radiographic findings of COVID-19 in various imaging modalities while keeping the preliminary focus on chest radiography, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound scans. Given the higher sensitivity and greater proficiency in detecting characteristic findings during the early stages, CT scans are more reliable in diagnosis and serve as a practical method in following up the disease time course. As research rapidly expands, we have emphasized the CO-RADS classification system as a tool to aid in communicating the likelihood of COVID-19 suspicion among healthcare workers. Additionally, the utilization of other scoring systems such as MuLBSTA, Radiological Assessment of Lung Edema, and Brixia in this pandemic are reviewed as they integrate the radiographic findings into an objective scoring system to risk stratify the patients and predict the severity of disease. Furthermore, current progress in the utilization of artificial intelligence via radiomics is evaluated. Lastly, the lesson from the first wave and preparation for the second wave from the point of view of radiology are summarized.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal finding and acute infection: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate rapid and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate rapid and acute cardiac injury: 1
    • accurate rapid and acute infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accurate rapid and acute setting: 1
    • accurate rapid and additional advantage: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adaptive immune system: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute cardiac injury and adaptive immune system: 1
    • acute infection and adaptive immune system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute infection and additional advantage: 1
    • acute infection and additional capacity: 1, 2
    • acute setting and additional capacity: 1