Author: Gbinigie, Kome; Frie, Kerstin
Title: Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review Cord-id: niic9dnr Document date: 2020_4_8
ID: niic9dnr
Snippet: BACKGROUND: On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic. To date, there are no medical treatments for COVID-19 with proven effectiveness. Novel treatments and/or vaccines will take time to be developed and distributed to patients. In light of this, there has been growing interest in the use of existing medications, such as chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as potential treatments of this disease. AIM: To establish the current evide
Document: BACKGROUND: On the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic. To date, there are no medical treatments for COVID-19 with proven effectiveness. Novel treatments and/or vaccines will take time to be developed and distributed to patients. In light of this, there has been growing interest in the use of existing medications, such as chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as potential treatments of this disease. AIM: To establish the current evidence for the effectiveness of CQ and HCQ in treating COVID-19. DESIGN & SETTING: A rapid review of the literature was conducted. METHOD: Electronic searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted on 21 March 2020. A further search was conducted in Google for relevant literature on 28 March 2020. RESULTS: There is limited evidence of in vitro activity of CQ/HCQ against SARS-CoV-2. A number of in vivo clinical trials are underway. The empirical data available from two of these trials reveal conflicting results. Both trials are characterised by small numbers of participants (n = 30 and n = 36) and suffer methodological limitations. No medium or long-term follow-up data is available. CONCLUSION: At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether CQ/HCQ are safe and effective treatments for COVID-19. High quality, adequately powered randomised clinical trials in primary and secondary care settings are urgently required to guide policymakers and clinicians. These studies should report medium- and long-term follow-up results, and safety data.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abnormal liver function and liver function test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- abnormal liver function and liver renal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- abnormal liver function and liver renal function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- abnormal liver function test and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- abnormal liver function test and liver function test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- abnormal renal function and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
- abnormal renal function and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- abnormal renal function and liver renal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- abnormal renal function and liver renal function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function test: 1, 2
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver renal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver renal function: 1, 2
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and long term medium: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date