Author: Groarke, Jenny M.; Berry, Emma; Graham-Wisener, Lisa; McKenna-Plumley, Phoebe E.; McGlinchey, Emily; Armour, Cherie
Title: Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study Cord-id: q4lh3ni1 Document date: 2020_9_24
ID: q4lh3ni1
Snippet: OBJECTIVES: Loneliness is a significant public health issue. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in lockdown measures limiting social contact. The UK public are worried about the impact of these measures on mental health outcomes. Understanding the prevalence and predictors of loneliness at this time is a priority issue for research. METHOD: The study employed a cross-sectional online survey design. Baseline data collected between March 23rd and April 24th 2020 from UK adults in the COVID-19 Psyc
Document: OBJECTIVES: Loneliness is a significant public health issue. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in lockdown measures limiting social contact. The UK public are worried about the impact of these measures on mental health outcomes. Understanding the prevalence and predictors of loneliness at this time is a priority issue for research. METHOD: The study employed a cross-sectional online survey design. Baseline data collected between March 23rd and April 24th 2020 from UK adults in the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study were analysed (N = 1964, 18–87 years, M = 37.11, SD = 12.86, 70% female). Logistic regression analysis examined the influence of sociodemographic, social, health and COVID-19 specific factors on loneliness. RESULTS: The prevalence of loneliness was 27% (530/1964). Risk factors for loneliness were younger age group (OR: 4.67–5.31), being separated or divorced (OR: 2.29), scores meeting clinical criteria for depression (OR: 1.74), greater emotion regulation difficulties (OR: 1.04), and poor quality sleep due to the COVID-19 crisis (OR: 1.30). Higher levels of social support (OR: 0.92), being married/co-habiting (OR: 0.35) and living with a greater number of adults (OR: 0.87) were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of loneliness during the initial phase of lockdown were high. Risk factors were not specific to the COVID-19 crisis. Findings suggest that supportive interventions to reduce loneliness should prioritise younger people and those with mental health symptoms. Improving emotion regulation and sleep quality, and increasing social support may be optimal initial targets to reduce the impact of COVID-19 regulations on mental health outcomes.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- academic community and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- academic community and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3
- academic community and loneliness address: 1
- acute phase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute phase and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute phase and loneliness address: 1
- acute phase and loneliness age: 1, 2
- adjust analysis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- adjust analysis and logistic regression model: 1
- adolescent child and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- live status and logistic regression: 1
- live versus and logistic regression: 1
- local government and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- lockdown health impact and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- lockdown impact and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- lockdown impact and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lockdown negative impact and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- lockdown prior and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- lockdown state and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date