Selected article for: "logistic regression analysis determine and lymphocyte count"

Author: Wen, Jun; Su, Yufei; Sun, Hongli; Zhang, Huiping; Li, Hui
Title: The combination of initial markers to predict refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Chinese children: a case control study
  • Cord-id: qqbmks8q
  • Document date: 2021_3_22
  • ID: qqbmks8q
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: Thise study is aimed to identify the biomarkers for predicting refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Chinese children at the time of the hospital admission. METHODS: The case control study retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and laboratory results of Chinese pediatric patients presenting with common and refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (CMPP and RMPP). Overall, there were 216 cases in the CMPP group and 88 cases in the RMPP group. Venous blood was c
    Document: OBJECTIVE: Thise study is aimed to identify the biomarkers for predicting refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Chinese children at the time of the hospital admission. METHODS: The case control study retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and laboratory results of Chinese pediatric patients presenting with common and refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (CMPP and RMPP). Overall, there were 216 cases in the CMPP group and 88 cases in the RMPP group. Venous blood was collected, and serum ferritin (SF), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil count/lymphocyte count (NLR), and other indexes were measured. A single factor analysis, an ROC curve analysis, and a logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors of RMPP and find combination of initial markers for RMPP. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the RMPP group and the CMPP group in mean SF (529.82 [357.86] vs. 147.22 [122.68] ng/mL), LDH (522.08 [389.08] vs. 286.85 [101.02] U/L), D-dimer (6.65 [5.66] vs. 1.46 [2.45] μg/mL), CRP (62.80 [52.15] vs. 19.03 [24.50] mg/L), PCT (0.80 [2.61] vs. 0.16 [0.44]) ng/mL, and NLR (4.14 [2.52] vs. 2.62 [1.55]), with P < 0.05 for each comparison. ROC cut-off values of the above indexes were 329.01 ng/mL, 375.50 U/L, 2.10 μg/mL, 43.08 mg/L, 0.08 ng/mL, and 2.96, respectively. The logistic regression analysis showed that SF, D-dimer, and CRP are independent risk factors to predict RMPP. CONCLUSION: SF, D-dimer, and CRP are statistically significant biomarkers to predict RMPP in Chinese children patients in the settings of pediatric emergency department.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal lung and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • abnormal lung and long term health: 1
    • abnormal lung and lung auscultation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abnormal lung and lung cell injury: 1
    • abnormal lung and lung consolidation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • abnormal lung auscultation and logistic regression: 1
    • abnormal lung auscultation and lung auscultation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • liver damage and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • liver damage and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • liver function and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • liver function and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • liver function and lung consolidation: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and long term complication: 1, 2
    • logistic regression analysis and long term health: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • logistic regression analysis and lung consolidation: 1, 2
    • logistic regression and long term complication: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and long term health: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and lung auscultation: 1
    • logistic regression and lung consolidation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11