Selected article for: "contact tracing and high testing rate"

Author: Knudsen, R.
Title: Testing for tracing or testing just for treating? A comparative analysis between strategies to face COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Cord-id: rjzther1
  • Document date: 2020_6_3
  • ID: rjzther1
    Snippet: There is some consensus in Europe and Asia about testing rates being crucial to controlling COVID-19 pandemics. There are though misconceptions on what means an effective high testing rate. This paper demonstrates that the rate of tests per detected case (Tests/Case) is the important variable, correlating negatively with the number of deaths. The higher the Tests/Case rate, the lower the death rate, as this predictor is causally related to contact tracing and isolation of the vectors of the dise
    Document: There is some consensus in Europe and Asia about testing rates being crucial to controlling COVID-19 pandemics. There are though misconceptions on what means an effective high testing rate. This paper demonstrates that the rate of tests per detected case (Tests/Case) is the important variable, correlating negatively with the number of deaths. The higher the Tests/Case rate, the lower the death rate, as this predictor is causally related to contact tracing and isolation of the vectors of the disease. Doubling Tests/Case typically divides by three the number of deaths. On the other hand, per capita testing rate is a poor predictor for the performance of policies to fight the pandemics. The number of tests per 1,000 inhabitants (Tests/1,000) tends to correlate positively with the number of deaths. In some cases, high levels of Tests/1,000 just mean an epidemic that ran out of control, with an explosion of cases that demands high testing rates just to confirm the diagnosis of the very sick.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • lockdown social distancing and low middle: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • lockdown social distancing and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4