Selected article for: "limited number and significant difference"

Author: Ding, Xin; Chen, Huan; Zhao, Hua; Zhang, Hongmin; He, Huaiwu; Cheng, Wei; Wang, Chunyao; Jiang, Wei; Ma, Jie; Qin, Yan; Liu, Zhengyin; Wang, Jinglan; Yan, Xiaowei; Li, Taisheng; Zhou, Xiang; Long, Yun; Zhang, Shuyang
Title: ECCO(2)R in 12 COVID-19 ARDS Patients With Extremely Low Compliance and Refractory Hypercapnia
  • Cord-id: rxajk1c9
  • Document date: 2021_7_8
  • ID: rxajk1c9
    Snippet: Purpose: A phenotype of COVID-19 ARDS patients with extremely low compliance and refractory hypercapnia was found in our ICU. In the context of limited number of ECMO machines, feasibility of a low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) based on the renal replacement therapy (RRT) platform in these patients was assessed. Methods: Single-center, prospective study. Refractory hypercapnia patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were included and divided into the adjusted group and una
    Document: Purpose: A phenotype of COVID-19 ARDS patients with extremely low compliance and refractory hypercapnia was found in our ICU. In the context of limited number of ECMO machines, feasibility of a low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO(2)R) based on the renal replacement therapy (RRT) platform in these patients was assessed. Methods: Single-center, prospective study. Refractory hypercapnia patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were included and divided into the adjusted group and unadjusted group according to the level of PaCO(2) after the application of the ECCO(2)R system. Ventilation parameters [tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate, and PEEP], platform pressure (Pplat) and driving pressure (DP), respiratory system compliance, arterial blood gases, and ECCO(2)R system characteristics were collected. Results: Twelve patients with refractory hypercapnia were enrolled, and the PaCO(2) was 64.5 [56-88.75] mmHg. In the adjusted group, VT was significantly reduced from 5.90 ± 0.16 to 5.08 ± 0.43 ml/kg PBW; DP and Pplat were also significantly reduced from 23.5 ± 2.72 mmHg and 29.88 ± 3.04 mmHg to 18.5 ± 2.62 mmHg and 24.75 ± 3.41 mmHg, respectively. In the unadjusted group, PaCO(2) decreased from 94 [86.25, 100.3] mmHg to 80 [67.50, 85.25] mmHg but with no significant difference, and the DP and Pplat were not decreased after weighing the pros and cons. Conclusions: A low-flow ECCO(2)R system based on the RRT platform enabled CO(2) removal and could also decrease the DP and Pplat significantly, which provided a new way to treat these COVID-19 ARDS patients with refractory hypercapnia and extremely low compliance. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04340414.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute brain injury and low tidal volume: 1
    • acute brain injury and low tidal volume ventilation: 1
    • acute brain injury and lung compliance: 1
    • acute lung injury and low tidal volume: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute lung injury and low tidal volume ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute lung injury and lung compliance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24