Selected article for: "distancing rate and SIR model"

Author: Philip J. Turk; Shih-Hsiung Chou; Marc A. Kowalkowski; Pooja P. Palmer; Jennifer S. Priem; Melanie D. Spencer; Yhenneko J. Taylor; Andrew D. McWilliams
Title: Modeling COVID-19 latent prevalence to assess a public health intervention at a state and regional scale
  • Document date: 2020_4_18
  • ID: j5o8it22_4
    Snippet: In response to the need for actionable data insights in our community and health system, investigators from the Atrium Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE) developed a series of COVID-19 forecasting models, which were used to guide Atrium Health's initial proactive response to ensure sufficient capacity to treat the expected surge in patient care demands. In this study, we present an initial Susceptible-Infected-Removed (SIR).....
    Document: In response to the need for actionable data insights in our community and health system, investigators from the Atrium Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE) developed a series of COVID-19 forecasting models, which were used to guide Atrium Health's initial proactive response to ensure sufficient capacity to treat the expected surge in patient care demands. In this study, we present an initial Susceptible-Infected-Removed (SIR) epidemic model and its evolution to the Susceptible-Infected-Removed-Social Distancing-Detection Rate (SIR-Int) model. Here we describe and compare these models, the spatial differences in a pandemic, the significance of observed cases versus actual prevalence in the setting of rapidly evolving testing strategies, the current epidemiological trends and the potential effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions applied locally (e.g., social distancing). We also offer recommendations for how community and health system leaders may interpret our models to better prepare and act to decrease the negative consequences of COVID-19 spread within their own communities.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • actual prevalence and epidemic model: 1
    • actual prevalence and epidemiological trend: 1
    • actual prevalence and health community: 1
    • actual prevalence and health system: 1, 2
    • better prepare and health community: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • better prepare and health community system: 1
    • better prepare and health system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • care demand and community spread: 1
    • care demand and epidemic model: 1, 2, 3
    • care demand and forecasting model: 1, 2, 3
    • care demand and health community: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • care demand and health community system: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • care demand and health system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • community spread and Distancing detection: 1, 2
    • community spread and epidemic model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • community spread and forecasting model: 1
    • community spread and health community: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • community spread and health community system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • community spread and health system: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25