Selected article for: "absolute reduction and new intervention"

Author: Lyles, Courtney R; Sarkar, Urmimala; Patel, Urvashi; Lisker, Sarah; Stark, Allison; Guzman, Vanessa; Patel, Ashwin
Title: Real-world insights from launching remote peer-to-peer mentoring in a safety net healthcare delivery setting
  • Cord-id: spqb4ll1
  • Document date: 2020_11_12
  • ID: spqb4ll1
    Snippet: Peer mentors have been proven to improve diabetes outcomes, especially among diverse patients. Delivering peer mentoring via remote strategies (phone, text, mobile applications) is critical, especially in light of the recent pandemic. We conducted a real-world evaluation of a remote diabetes intervention in a safety-net delivery system in New York. We summarized the uptake, content, and pre-post clinical effectiveness for English- and Spanish-speaking participants. Of patients who could be reach
    Document: Peer mentors have been proven to improve diabetes outcomes, especially among diverse patients. Delivering peer mentoring via remote strategies (phone, text, mobile applications) is critical, especially in light of the recent pandemic. We conducted a real-world evaluation of a remote diabetes intervention in a safety-net delivery system in New York. We summarized the uptake, content, and pre-post clinical effectiveness for English- and Spanish-speaking participants. Of patients who could be reached, 71% (n = 690/974) were enrolled, and 90% of those (n = 618/690) participated in coaching. Patients and mentors had a mean of 32 check-ins, and each patient set an average of 10 goals. 29% of the participants accessed the program via the smartphone application. Among participants with complete hemoglobin A1c data (n = 179), there was an absolute 1.71% reduction (P < .01). There are multiple lessons for successful implementation of remote peer coaching into settings serving diverse patients, including meaningful patient-mentor matching and addressing social determinants.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • academic medical center and low income: 1, 2, 3
    • action planning and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • additional patient and low proportion: 1
    • lived experience and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6