Selected article for: "average duration and clinical resource"

Author: Yock, Adam D.; Ahmed, Mahmoud; Ayala‐Peacock, Diandra; Chakravarthy, A. Bapsi; Price, Michael
Title: Initial analysis of the dosimetric benefit and clinical resource cost of CBCT‐based online adaptive radiotherapy for patients with cancers of the cervix or rectum
  • Cord-id: tsrlx1dl
  • Document date: 2021_9_16
  • ID: tsrlx1dl
    Snippet: PURPOSE: This provides a benchmark of dosimetric benefit and clinical cost of cone‐beam CT‐based online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) technology for cervical and rectal cancer patients. METHODS: An emulator of a CBCT‐based online ART system was used to simulate more than 300 treatments for 13 cervical and 15 rectal cancer patients. CBCT images were used to generate adaptive replans. To measure clinical resource cost, the six phases of the workflow were timed. To evaluate the dosimetric benef
    Document: PURPOSE: This provides a benchmark of dosimetric benefit and clinical cost of cone‐beam CT‐based online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) technology for cervical and rectal cancer patients. METHODS: An emulator of a CBCT‐based online ART system was used to simulate more than 300 treatments for 13 cervical and 15 rectal cancer patients. CBCT images were used to generate adaptive replans. To measure clinical resource cost, the six phases of the workflow were timed. To evaluate the dosimetric benefit, changes in dosimetric values were assessed. These included minimum dose (Dmin) and volume receiving 95% of prescription (V95%) for the planning target volume (PTV) and the clinical target volume (CTV), and maximum 2 cc's (D2cc) of the bladder, bowel, rectum, and sigmoid colon. RESULTS: The average duration of the workflow was 24.4 and 9.2 min for cervical and rectal cancer patients, respectively. A large proportion of time was dedicated to editing target contours (13.1 and 2.7 min, respectively). For cervical cancer patients, the replan changed the Dmin to the PTVs and CTVs for each fraction 0.25 and 0.25 Gy, respectively. The replan changed the V95% by 9.2 and 7.9%. The D2cc to the bladder, bowel, rectum, and sigmoid colon for each fraction changed −0.02, −0.08, −0.07, and −0.04 Gy, respectively. For rectal cancer patients, the replan changed the Dmin to the PTVs and CTVs for each fraction of 0.20 and 0.24 Gy, respectively. The replan changed the V95% by 4.1 and 1.5%. The D2cc to the bladder and bowel for each fraction changed 0.02 and −0.02 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric benefits can be achieved with CBCT‐based online ART that is amenable to conventional appointment slots. The clinical significance of these benefits remains to be determined. Managing contours was the primary factor affecting the total duration and is imperative for safe and effective adaptive radiotherapy.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal sbrt and adaptive treatment: 1
    • abdominal sbrt and additional time: 1
    • abdominal sbrt treat and adaptive radiotherapy: 1
    • abdominal sbrt treat and adaptive treatment: 1