Selected article for: "error rate and transmission model"

Author: Chen Wei; Zhengyang Wang; Zhichao Liang; Quanying Liu
Title: The focus and timing of COVID-19 pandemic control measures under healthcare resource constraints
  • Document date: 2020_4_19
  • ID: 5psqro9d_10
    Snippet: Through cross-validation (see Model evaluation in Methods), it was shown that the timedependent model, which assumed exponentially decreasing transmission rate and isolation delay, had lower prediction error (mean ΔRMSE = -779. 16 , p(ΔRMSE < 0) = 0.758, Figure S2B ), compared to the null model that assumed those factors to be constant......
    Document: Through cross-validation (see Model evaluation in Methods), it was shown that the timedependent model, which assumed exponentially decreasing transmission rate and isolation delay, had lower prediction error (mean ΔRMSE = -779. 16 , p(ΔRMSE < 0) = 0.758, Figure S2B ), compared to the null model that assumed those factors to be constant.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • isolation transmission rate and model evaluation: 1
    • isolation transmission rate and null model: 1
    • isolation transmission rate and timedependent model: 1
    • isolation transmission rate and transmission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
    • low prediction error and prediction error: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • method model evaluation and model evaluation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • model evaluation and prediction error: 1
    • model evaluation and transmission rate: 1, 2, 3
    • null model and transmission rate: 1
    • prediction error and transmission rate: 1