Author: Phillips, Nicholas Edward; Mareschal, Julie; Schwab, Nathalie; Manoogian, Emily N. C.; Borloz, Sylvie; Ostinelli, Giada; Gauthier-Jaques, Aude; Umwali, Sylvie; Rodriguez, Elena Gonzalez; Aeberli, Daniel; Hans, Didier; Panda, Satchidananda; Rodondi, Nicolas; Naef, Felix; Collet, Tinh-Hai
Title: The Effects of Time-Restricted Eating versus Standard Dietary Advice on Weight, Metabolic Health and the Consumption of Processed Food: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial in Community-Based Adults Cord-id: v3vx36ep Document date: 2021_3_23
ID: v3vx36ep
Snippet: Weight loss is key to controlling the increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components, i.e., central obesity, hypertension, prediabetes and dyslipidaemia. The goals of our study were two-fold. First, we characterised the relationships between eating duration, unprocessed and processed food consumption and metabolic health. During 4 weeks of observation, 213 adults used a smartphone application to record food and drink consumption, which was annotated for food processing level
Document: Weight loss is key to controlling the increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components, i.e., central obesity, hypertension, prediabetes and dyslipidaemia. The goals of our study were two-fold. First, we characterised the relationships between eating duration, unprocessed and processed food consumption and metabolic health. During 4 weeks of observation, 213 adults used a smartphone application to record food and drink consumption, which was annotated for food processing levels following the NOVA classification. Low consumption of unprocessed food and low physical activity showed significant associations with multiple MS components. Second, in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, we compared the metabolic benefits of 12 h time-restricted eating (TRE) to standard dietary advice (SDA) in 54 adults with an eating duration > 14 h and at least one MS component. After 6 months, those randomised to TRE lost 1.6% of initial body weight (SD 2.9, p = 0.01), compared to the absence of weight loss with SDA (−1.1%, SD 3.5, p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in weight loss between TRE and SDA (between-group difference −0.88%, 95% confidence interval −3.1 to 1.3, p = 0.43). Our results show the potential of smartphone records to predict metabolic health and highlight that further research is needed to improve individual responses to TRE such as a shorter eating window or its actual clock time.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- activity questionnaire and lost weight: 1, 2, 3, 4
- activity questionnaire and lost weight weight: 1, 2, 3, 4
- activity questionnaire and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3
- adipose tissue and lost weight: 1
- lost weight and low prevalence: 1
- lost weight and macronutrient calorie: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date