Author: Cho, Sung-Yeon; Park, Sung-Soo; Song, Min-Kyu; Bae, Young Yi; Lee, Dong-Gun; Kim, Dong-Wook
Title: Prognosis Score System to Predict Survival for COVID-19 Cases: a Korean Nationwide Cohort Study Cord-id: w3blv7a7 Document date: 2021_2_22
ID: w3blv7a7
Snippet: BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, an initial risk-adapted allocation is crucial for managing medical resources and providing intensive care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify factors that predict the overall survival rate for COVID-19 cases and develop a COVID-19 prognosis score (COPS) system based on these factors. In addition, disease severity and the length of hospital stay for patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a nationwide c
Document: BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, an initial risk-adapted allocation is crucial for managing medical resources and providing intensive care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify factors that predict the overall survival rate for COVID-19 cases and develop a COVID-19 prognosis score (COPS) system based on these factors. In addition, disease severity and the length of hospital stay for patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a nationwide cohort of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases between January and April 2020 in Korea. The cohort was split randomly into a development cohort and a validation cohort with a 2:1 ratio. In the development cohort (n=3729), we tried to identify factors associated with overall survival and develop a scoring system to predict the overall survival rate by using parameters identified by the Cox proportional hazard regression model with bootstrapping methods. In the validation cohort (n=1865), we evaluated the prediction accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The score of each variable in the COPS system was rounded off following the log-scaled conversion of the adjusted hazard ratio. RESULTS: Among the 5594 patients included in this analysis, 234 (4.2%) died after receiving a COVID-19 diagnosis. In the development cohort, six parameters were significantly related to poor overall survival: older age, dementia, chronic renal failure, dyspnea, mental disturbance, and absolute lymphocyte count <1000/mm(3). The following risk groups were formed: low-risk (score 0-2), intermediate-risk (score 3), high-risk (score 4), and very high-risk (score 5-7) groups. The COPS system yielded an area under the curve value of 0.918 for predicting the 14-day survival rate and 0.896 for predicting the 28-day survival rate in the validation cohort. Using the COPS system, 28-day survival rates were discriminatively estimated at 99.8%, 95.4%, 82.3%, and 55.1% in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very high-risk groups, respectively, of the total cohort (P<.001). The length of hospital stay and disease severity were directly associated with overall survival (P<.001), and the hospital stay duration was significantly longer among survivors (mean 26.1, SD 10.7 days) than among nonsurvivors (mean 15.6, SD 13.3 days). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed predictive COPS system may assist in making risk-adapted decisions for the allocation of medical resources, including intensive care, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute number and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- absolute number and lung involvement: 1
- absolute number and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
- academic hospital and active treatment: 1
- academic hospital and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
- academic hospital and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- academic hospital and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4
- academic hospital and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy yield and logistic regression: 1
- active remain and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- active treatment and admission lymphopenia: 1
- active treatment and log rank test compare: 1
- active treatment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- active treatment and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- active treatment and long hospital stay: 1
- active treatment and long term care facility: 1
- active treatment and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- active treatment and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- active treatment cancer and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date