Author: Harada, Yuichi; Takahashi, Hitoshi; Trusheim, Heidi; Roth, Bernhard; Mizuta, Katsumi; Hirataâ€Saito, Asumi; Ogane, Teruko; Odagiri, Takato; Tashiro, Masato; Yamamoto, Norio
Title: Comparison of suspension MDCK cells, adherent MDCK cells, and LLCâ€MK2 cells for selective isolation of influenza viruses to be used as vaccine seeds Cord-id: wk49ds8y Document date: 2019_10_25
ID: wk49ds8y
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Cellâ€based influenza vaccines can solve the problem of the frequent occurrence of egg adaptation–associated antigenic changes observed in eggâ€based vaccines. Seed viruses for cellâ€based vaccines can be prepared from clinical specimens by cell culture; however, clinical samples risk harboring respiratory viruses other than influenza virus. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the patterns of coâ€infection in clinical samples and explore whether cell culture technology ca
Document: BACKGROUND: Cellâ€based influenza vaccines can solve the problem of the frequent occurrence of egg adaptation–associated antigenic changes observed in eggâ€based vaccines. Seed viruses for cellâ€based vaccines can be prepared from clinical specimens by cell culture; however, clinical samples risk harboring respiratory viruses other than influenza virus. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the patterns of coâ€infection in clinical samples and explore whether cell culture technology can selectively propagate influenza viruses from samples containing other respiratory viruses. METHODS: A total of 341 clinical specimens were collected from patients with influenza or influenzaâ€like illness and analyzed by ResPlex II assay to detect 18 respiratory viruses. The patterns of coâ€infection were statistically analyzed with Fisher's exact test. The samples with double or triple infections were passaged in suspension MDCK cells (MDCKâ€S), adherent MDCK cells (MDCKâ€A), and LLCâ€MK2D cells. Cellâ€passaged samples were analyzed by ResPlex II assay again to investigate whether each cell line could amplify influenza viruses and eliminate other respiratory viruses. RESULTS: Double infections were detected in 8.5% and triple infections in 0.9% of the collected clinical specimens. We identified four pairs of viruses with significant correlation. For all samples with double and triple infection, MDCKâ€S and MDCKâ€A could selectively propagate influenza viruses, while eliminating all contaminating viruses. In contrast, LLCâ€MK2D showed lower isolation efficiency for influenza virus and higher isolation efficiency for coxsackievirus/echovirus than MDCKâ€S and MDCKâ€A. CONCLUSIONS: Both MDCKâ€S and MDCKâ€A are considered suitable for the preparation of influenza vaccine seed viruses without adventitious agents or eggâ€adaptation mutations.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date