Author: Ishaq, Bushra; Østby, Lars; Johannessen, Asbjørn
Title: Muslim religiosity and health outcomes: A cross-sectional study among muslims in Norway Cord-id: yv4gyq80 Document date: 2021_6_11
ID: yv4gyq80
Snippet: The aim of this study is to address the association between Muslim religiosity and health outcomes, and investigate if religious Muslims are more likely to be of disadvantage of health than non-religious Muslims. A cross-sectional study-design is used with a representative sample of Muslims in Norway including 2661 respondents in age 16 years–74 years from the “The Survey On Living Conditions Among Persons With An Immigrant Background 2016â€, conducted by Statistics Norway. Multivariate log
Document: The aim of this study is to address the association between Muslim religiosity and health outcomes, and investigate if religious Muslims are more likely to be of disadvantage of health than non-religious Muslims. A cross-sectional study-design is used with a representative sample of Muslims in Norway including 2661 respondents in age 16 years–74 years from the “The Survey On Living Conditions Among Persons With An Immigrant Background 2016â€, conducted by Statistics Norway. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the relationship between Muslim religiosity and health outcomes. The health outcomes in focus are self-reported health, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, neck and back illnesses, mental health problems, sleeping disorders, consumption of alcohol, and smoking. Association between Muslim religiosity and positive health outcomes were found. Smoking and alcohol consumption were negatively associated with Muslim religiosity. The findings suggest no evidence that religious Muslims are more likely than non-religious Muslims to be of disadvantage of health, and the study do not support the premise that Islam as a barrier to health. In addition, our findings suggest that Muslim religiosity might serve as a resource either predicting better health outcomes or that Muslim religiosity may be a factor that exists if good health is evident. As our findings cannot define any cause-effect relation between Muslim religiosity and health outcomes, given the cross-sectional design of the study, we emphasize the need of further research that investigates how Muslim religiosity is associated to health.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active approach and logistic regression analysis: 1
- active approach and low income: 1, 2, 3
- active approach and low number: 1
- address question and logistic regression: 1, 2
- address question and low income: 1, 2
- adherent health and logistic regression: 1
- adherent health and low income: 1
- adjust model and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- adjust model and low income: 1
- adjust model and low number: 1
- living condition and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- living condition and logistic regression analysis: 1
- living condition and low income: 1, 2
- logistic regression analysis and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression analysis and low income group: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and low income group: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date