Author: Mejri, Nesrine; Berrazega, Yosra; Ouertani, Emna; Rachdi, Haifa; Bohli, Mariem; Kochbati, Lotfi; Boussen, Hamouda
Title: Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance: another challenge in cancer patients Cord-id: 3z5ubeft Document date: 2021_7_19
ID: 3z5ubeft
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: We aimed to measure the acceptability towards the COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients and to investigate determinant factors associated with the patient’s choice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with a self-administered questionnaire delivered to 329 cancer patients in 3 oncology cancer centers in Tunisia between February-May 2021. Logistic regression was used to evaluate odds ratio predicting patient’s intentions toward the vaccine. RESULTS: Acceptance rate
Document: INTRODUCTION: We aimed to measure the acceptability towards the COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients and to investigate determinant factors associated with the patient’s choice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with a self-administered questionnaire delivered to 329 cancer patients in 3 oncology cancer centers in Tunisia between February-May 2021. Logistic regression was used to evaluate odds ratio predicting patient’s intentions toward the vaccine. RESULTS: Acceptance rate was 50.5%, 28.3% (n = 93) reported to definitely refuse the vaccine and 21.2% (n = 70) did not make their decision yet. High educational level, history of comorbidities, history of influenza vaccination in the current season, and patient’s opinion about the severity of COVID-19 did not predict vaccine resistance. However, patients who think that the vaccine may interfere with treatment efficacy (OR = 7.28, 95%CI [2.5–12.32]), or may impact cancer outcome (OR = 6.14, 95%CI [2.27–16.7]), were significantly more likely to refuse the vaccine. Patients who disagree that the vaccine is a major weapon against the pandemic (OR = 6.07, 95%CI [2.34–9.52]) or that it could reduce the virus transmission (OR = 7.34, 95%CI [4.22–11.81]) were also significantly more likely to reject the vaccination. Safety concerns were also significant predictive factors (OR = 7.9, 95%CI [4.10–11.27]. Confidence level in the authorities played a significant role in patient’s acceptance of the vaccine, indeed patients who are not registered (OR = 5.9, 95%CI [1.58–8.7]) or not informed about the Tunisian national vaccination platform EVAX (OR = 5.51, 95%CI [2.1–7.9]) were more likely to be against the vaccine. CONCLUSION: Cancer patient’s education about the impact of the vaccine on their disease and on the COVID-19 is needed. Governments should build strategies to gain more population confidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06419-y.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acceptance rate and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- acceptance rate and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acceptance rate and low vaccine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- access equitable and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- access equitable and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
- access equitable and low vaccine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- active cancer and liver renal: 1, 2, 3
- active cancer and liver renal diabetes: 1, 2
- active cancer and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- active cancer and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- active treatment and liver renal: 1
- active treatment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- active treatment and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- liver renal and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- liver renal and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
- liver renal diabetes and logistic regression: 1
- local ethical committee and logistic regression: 1, 2
- local ethical committee and logistic regression analysis: 1
- logistic regression and low vaccine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date