Author: Walker, K.; Jiarpakdee, J.; Loupis, A.; Tantithamthavorn, C.; Joe, K.; Ben-Meir, M.; Akhlaghi, H.; Hutton, J.; Wang, W.; Stephenson, M.; Blecher, G.; Buntine, P.; Sweeny, A.; Turhan, B.; Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Clinical Trial Network
Title: Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study Cord-id: cplts1bo Document date: 2021_3_24
ID: cplts1bo
Snippet: Objective Patients, families and community members would like emergency department wait time visibility. This would improve patient journeys through emergency medicine. The study objective was to derive, internally and externally validate machine learning models to predict emergency patient wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments. Methods Twelve emergency departments provided three years of retrospective administrative data from Australia (2017-19). Descriptive
Document: Objective Patients, families and community members would like emergency department wait time visibility. This would improve patient journeys through emergency medicine. The study objective was to derive, internally and externally validate machine learning models to predict emergency patient wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments. Methods Twelve emergency departments provided three years of retrospective administrative data from Australia (2017-19). Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated. Model performance was tested on COVID-19 period data (January to June 2020). Results There were 1,930,609 patient episodes analysed and median site wait times varied from 24 to 54 minutes. Individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from +/-22.6 minutes (95%CI 22.4,22.9) to +/- 44.0 minutes (95%CI 43.4,44.4). Global model prediction median absolute errors varied from +/-33.9 minutes (95%CI 33.4, 34.0) to +/-43.8 minutes (95%CI 43.7, 43.9). Random forest and linear regression models performed the best, rolling average models under-estimated wait times. Important variables were triage category, last-k patient average wait time, and arrival time. Wait time prediction models are not transferable across hospitals. Models performed well during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Conclusions Electronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to approximate emergency patient wait times. A general model is less accurate if applied without site specific factors.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute error and actual error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- absolute error and actual time: 1
- absolute error and acute care: 1, 2
- absolute error and admission rate: 1, 2
- absolute error and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3
- absolute error and machine learn: 1
- absolute error and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58
- absolute error and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- absolute error and machine statistical: 1
- absolute error and machine statistical learning: 1
- absolute error and mae absolute errors: 1, 2, 3
- absolute error and mae difference: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absolute error and mae median absolute errors: 1
- absolute errors and actual error: 1, 2
- absolute errors and lockdown period: 1
- absolute errors and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absolute errors and machine statistical: 1
- absolute errors and machine statistical learning: 1
- absolute errors and mae absolute errors: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date