Author: Moll, Fabian; Bechtold-Peters, Karoline; Mellman, James; Sigg, Jurgen; Friess, Wolfgang
Title: Replacing the emulsion for bake-on siliconization of containers - comparison of emulsion stability and container performance in the context of protein formulations. Cord-id: 6m1klv7m Document date: 2021_8_16
ID: 6m1klv7m
Snippet: Pre-filled syringes have simplified parenteral administration of protein drugs. To ensure an easy and consistent movement of the plunger, the inner glass container surface is typically siliconized. For bake-on siliconization emulsions are sprayed on and heat treated. Due to the European Union regulation REACh (Regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) the use of certain emulsion components, partially constituting the gold standard Liveoâ„¢ 36
Document: Pre-filled syringes have simplified parenteral administration of protein drugs. To ensure an easy and consistent movement of the plunger, the inner glass container surface is typically siliconized. For bake-on siliconization emulsions are sprayed on and heat treated. Due to the European Union regulation REACh (Regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) the use of certain emulsion components, partially constituting the gold standard Liveoâ„¢ 365 35% Dimethicone NF Emulsion (Liveoâ„¢ 365), becomes restricted and Liveoâ„¢ 366 35% Dimethicone NF Emulsion (Liveoâ„¢ 366) has been introduced as an alternative. This change may affect the handling properties as well as the silicone layer formed. The purpose of these studies was to identify any differences that may influence the stability and safety of the final drug/device combination product to enable the use of the new emulsion. We compared silicone emulsions Liveoâ„¢ 365 and Liveoâ„¢ 366 and dilutions focusing on I) their general physical stability, II) the thermal degradation process of the emulsions and their components, and III) the resulting silicone layer concerning chemistry, morphology, and functionality. The results were linked to the assessment of the final product regarding particle formation and long-term stability. A comparison of the emulsions Liveoâ„¢ 365 and Liveoâ„¢ 366 for bake-on siliconization is presented to support the transition of the latter as it becomes mandatory with REACh. Our studies show that the two emulsions do not significantly differ with respect to handling and stability, the resultant silicone layer characteristics as well as its functionality. We conclude that the transition to the new emulsion will not significantly impact the final product or the layer performance upon storage and with respect to particle formation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date