Selected article for: "admission patient and blood cell"

Author: Assaf, Dan; Gutman, Ya’ara; Neuman, Yair; Segal, Gad; Amit, Sharon; Gefen-Halevi, Shiraz; Shilo, Noya; Epstein, Avi; Mor-Cohen, Ronit; Biber, Asaf; Rahav, Galia; Levy, Itzchak; Tirosh, Amit
Title: Utilization of machine-learning models to accurately predict the risk for critical COVID-19
  • Cord-id: 5rhw1bl6
  • Document date: 2020_8_18
  • ID: 5rhw1bl6
    Snippet: Among patients with Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the ability to identify patients at risk for deterioration during their hospital stay is essential for effective patient allocation and management. To predict patient risk for critical COVID-19 based on status at admission using machine-learning models. Retrospective study based on a database of tertiary medical center with designated departments for patients with COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 at admission, based on low oxygen saturat
    Document: Among patients with Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the ability to identify patients at risk for deterioration during their hospital stay is essential for effective patient allocation and management. To predict patient risk for critical COVID-19 based on status at admission using machine-learning models. Retrospective study based on a database of tertiary medical center with designated departments for patients with COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 at admission, based on low oxygen saturation, low partial arterial oxygen pressure, were excluded. The primary outcome was risk for critical disease, defined as mechanical ventilation, multi-organ failure, admission to the ICU, and/or death. Three different machine-learning models were used to predict patient deterioration and compared to currently suggested predictors and to the APACHEII risk-prediction score. Among 6995 patients evaluated, 162 were hospitalized with non-severe COVID-19, of them, 25 (15.4%) patients deteriorated to critical COVID-19. Machine-learning models outperformed the all other parameters, including the APACHE II score (ROC AUC of 0.92 vs. 0.79, respectively), reaching 88.0% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity and 92.0% accuracy in predicting critical COVID-19. The most contributory variables to the models were APACHE II score, white blood cell count, time from symptoms to admission, oxygen saturation and blood lymphocytes count. Machine-learning models demonstrated high efficacy in predicting critical COVID-19 compared to the most efficacious tools available. Hence, artificial intelligence may be applied for accurate risk prediction of patients with COVID-19, to optimize patients triage and in-hospital allocation, better prioritization of medical resources and improved overall management of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute neutrophil count and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • absolute neutrophil count and lymphocyte crp: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • accuracy improve and liver kidney: 1
    • accuracy improve and lymphocyte count: 1
    • accuracy positive predictive value and acute phase: 1
    • acute phase and liver injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute phase and liver kidney: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute phase and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • admission clinical parameter and lymphocyte count: 1
    • admission mean age and liver kidney: 1
    • liver injury and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • liver kidney and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • liver kidney function test and lymphocyte count: 1