Author: Joshi, Rohan P.; Pejaver, Vikas; Hammarlund, Noah E.; Sung, Heungsup; Lee, Seong Kyu; Furmanchuk, Al’ona; Lee, Hye-Young; Scott, Gregory; Gombar, Saurabh; Shah, Nigam; Shen, Sam; Nassiri, Anna; Schneider, Daniel; Ahmad, Faraz S.; Liebovitz, David; Kho, Abel; Mooney, Sean; Pinsky, Benjamin A.; Banaei, Niaz
Title: A predictive tool for identification of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative emergency department patients using routine test results Cord-id: 6ydyzcw4 Document date: 2020_6_10
ID: 6ydyzcw4
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Testing for COVID-19 remains limited in the United States and across the world. Poor allocation of limited testing resources leads to misutilization of health system resources, which complementary rapid testing tools could ameliorate. OBJECTIVE: To prediction tool based on complete blood count components and patient sex could predict SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control design for collection of data and a logistic regression prediction model was used.
Document: BACKGROUND: Testing for COVID-19 remains limited in the United States and across the world. Poor allocation of limited testing resources leads to misutilization of health system resources, which complementary rapid testing tools could ameliorate. OBJECTIVE: To prediction tool based on complete blood count components and patient sex could predict SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control design for collection of data and a logistic regression prediction model was used. Participants were emergency department patients > 18 years old who had concurrent complete blood counts and SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. 33 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive and 357 negative patients at Stanford Health Care used for model training. Validation cohorts consisted of emergency department patients > 18 years old who had concurrent complete blood counts and SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing in Northern California (41 PCR positive, 495 PCR negative), Seattle, Washington (40 PCR positive, 306 PCR negative), Chicago, Illinois (245 PCR positive, 1015 PCR negative), and South Korea (9 PCR positive, 236 PCR negative). RESULTS: A decision support tool that utilizes components of complete blood count and patient sex for prediction of SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity demonstrated a C-statistic of 78%, an optimized sensitivity of 93%, and generalizability to other emergency department populations. By restricting PCR testing to predicted positive patients in a hypothetical scenario of 1000 patients requiring testing but testing resources limited to 60% of patients, this tool would allow a 33% increase in properly allocated resources. CONCLUSIONS: A prediction tool based on complete blood count results can better allocate SARS-CoV-2 testing and other health care resources such as personal protective equipment during a pandemic surge.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute alc lymphocyte count and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absolute neutrophil count and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- absolute neutrophil count and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- absolute neutrophil count and low resource: 1
- absolute neutrophil count and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absolute neutrophil count and machine learning: 1, 2, 3
- local transmission and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- local transmission and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- local transmission and low resource: 1
- local transmission and lymphocyte count: 1
- local transmission and machine learning: 1
- logistic regression and low resource: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- logistic regression and low resource health system: 1
- logistic regression and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression model and low resource: 1
- logistic regression model and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression model and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date