Author: Yasuda, Hideto; Okano, Hiromu; Mayumi, Takuya; Nakane, Masaki; Shime, Nobuaki
Title: Association of noninvasive respiratory support with mortality and intubation rates in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Cord-id: bws6mi3g Document date: 2021_4_12
ID: bws6mi3g
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Noninvasive respiratory support devices may reduce the tracheal intubation rate compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). To date, few studies have compared high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV). We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of three respiratory support devices in patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichus
Document: BACKGROUND: Noninvasive respiratory support devices may reduce the tracheal intubation rate compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). To date, few studies have compared high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV). We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of three respiratory support devices in patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichushi databases were searched. Studies including adults aged ≥ 16 years with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and randomized-controlled trials that compared two different oxygenation devices (COT, NPPV, or HFNC) before tracheal intubation were included. A frequentist-based approach with a multivariate random-effects meta-analysis was used. The network meta-analysis was performed using the GRADE Working Group approach. The outcomes were short-term mortality and intubation rate. RESULTS: Among 5507 records, 27 studies (4618 patients) were included. The main cause of acute hypoxic respiratory failure was pneumonia. Compared with COT, NPPV and HFNC use tended to reduce mortality (relative risk, 0.88 and 0.93, respectively; 95% confidence intervals, 0.76–1.01 and 0.80–1.08, respectively; both low certainty) and lower the risk of endotracheal intubation (0.81 and 0.78; 0.72–0.91 and 0.68–0.89, respectively; both low certainty); however, short-term mortality or intubation rates did not differ (0.94 and 1.04, respectively; 0.78–1.15 and 0.88–1.22, respectively; both low certainty) between NPPV and HFNC use. CONCLUSION: NPPV and HFNC use are associated with a decreased risk of endotracheal intubation; however, there are no significant differences in short-term mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020139105, 01/21/2020) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-021-00539-7.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal surgery and abstract title: 1
- abdominal surgery and acute exacerbation: 1
- abdominal surgery and acute lung injury: 1
- abdominal surgery and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abdominal surgery and acute respiratory distress syndrome ards: 1, 2, 3
- abdominal surgery and acute respiratory failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- abdominal surgery and additional file: 1
- abdominal surgery and low certainty: 1
- abdominal surgery and low mortality: 1, 2
- abstract study and acute hypoxic respiratory failure: 1
- abstract study and acute lung injury: 1
- abstract study and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1
- abstract study and acute respiratory distress syndrome ards: 1
- abstract study and acute respiratory failure: 1, 2
- abstract study and low certainty: 1, 2
- abstract study and low mortality: 1
- abstract title and acute respiratory failure: 1
- abstract title and low certainty: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abstract title and low mortality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date