Selected article for: "low severity and lung parenchyma"
Author: Grassi, Roberto; Cappabianca, Salvatore; Urraro, Fabrizio; Feragalli, Beatrice; Montanelli, Alessandro; Patelli, Gianluigi; Granata, Vincenza; Giacobbe, Giuliana; Russo, Gaetano Maria; Grillo, Assunta; De Lisio, Angela; Paura, Cesare; Clemente, Alfredo; Gagliardi, Giuliano; Magliocchetti, Simona; Cozzi, Diletta; Fusco, Roberta; Belfiore, Maria Paola; Grassi, Roberta; Miele, Vittorio
Title: Chest CT Computerized Aided Quantification of PNEUMONIA Lesions in COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison among Three Commercial Software
  • Cord-id: 5yxonj89
  • Document date: 2020_9_22
    • ID: 5yxonj89
    Snippet: Purpose: To compare different commercial software in the quantification of Pneumonia Lesions in COVID-19 infection and to stratify the patients based on the disease severity using on chest computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined 162 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. All cases were evaluated separately by radiologists (visually) and by using three computer software programs: (1)
    Document: Purpose: To compare different commercial software in the quantification of Pneumonia Lesions in COVID-19 infection and to stratify the patients based on the disease severity using on chest computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined 162 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. All cases were evaluated separately by radiologists (visually) and by using three computer software programs: (1) Thoracic VCAR software, GE Healthcare, United States; (2) Myrian, Intrasense, France; (3) InferRead, InferVision Europe, Wiesbaden, Germany. The degree of lesions was visually scored by the radiologist using a score on 5 levels (none, mild, moderate, severe, and critic). The parameters obtained using the computer tools included healthy residual lung parenchyma, ground-glass opacity area, and consolidation volume. Intraclass coefficient (ICC), Spearman correlation analysis, and non-parametric tests were performed. Results: Thoracic VCAR software was not able to perform volumes segmentation in 26/162 (16.0%) cases, Myrian software in 12/162 (7.4%) patients while InferRead software in 61/162 (37.7%) patients. A great variability (ICC ranged for 0.17 to 0.51) was detected among the quantitative measurements of the residual healthy lung parenchyma volume, GGO, and consolidations volumes calculated by different computer tools. The overall radiological severity score was moderately correlated with the residual healthy lung parenchyma volume obtained by ThoracicVCAR or Myrian software, with the GGO area obtained by the ThoracicVCAR tool and with consolidation volume obtained by Myrian software. Quantified volumes by InferRead software had a low correlation with the overall radiological severity score. Conclusions: Computer-aided pneumonia quantification could be an easy and feasible way to stratify COVID-19 cases according to severity; however, a great variability among quantitative measurements provided by computer tools should be considered.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • low correlation and machine learning: 1, 2, 3
    • low variability and lung field: 1
    • low variability and lung score: 1
    • low variability and machine learn: 1
    • low variability and machine learning: 1, 2
    • lung abnormality and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lung lesion and machine learning: 1, 2, 3
    • lung parenchyma and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • lung parenchyma volume and machine learning: 1, 2
    • lung score and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • lung volume and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13