Selected article for: "AUC curve area and diagnostic sensitivity"

Author: Abdollahpour, Ibrahim; Aguilar-Palacio, Isabel; Gonzalez-Garcia, Juan; Vaseghi, Golnaz; Otroj, Zahra; Manteghinejad, Amirreza; Mosayebi, Azam; Salimi, Yahya; Haghjooy Javanmard, Shaghayegh
Title: Model Prediction for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Case–Control Study in Isfahan, Iran
  • Cord-id: 79ba3x6f
  • Document date: 2021_2_16
  • ID: 79ba3x6f
    Snippet: The COVID-19 pandemic has now imposed an enormous global burden as well as a large mortality in a short time period. Although there is no promising treatment, identification of early predictors of in-hospital mortality would be critically important in reducing its worldwide mortality. We aimed to suggest a prediction model for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19. In this case–control study, we recruited 513 confirmed patients with COVID-19 from February 18 to March 26, 2020 from Isfahan COVID-1
    Document: The COVID-19 pandemic has now imposed an enormous global burden as well as a large mortality in a short time period. Although there is no promising treatment, identification of early predictors of in-hospital mortality would be critically important in reducing its worldwide mortality. We aimed to suggest a prediction model for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19. In this case–control study, we recruited 513 confirmed patients with COVID-19 from February 18 to March 26, 2020 from Isfahan COVID-19 registry. Based on extracted laboratory, clinical, and demographic data, we created an in-hospital mortality predictive model using gradient boosting. We also determined the diagnostic performance of the proposed model including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) as well as their 95% CIs. Of 513 patients, there were 60 (11.7%) in-hospital deaths during the study period. The diagnostic values of the suggested model based on the gradient boosting method with oversampling techniques using all of the original data were specificity of 98.5% (95% CI: 96.8–99.4), sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 94–100), negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 99.2–100), positive predictive value of 89.6% (95% CI: 79.7–95.7), and an AUC of 98.6%. The suggested model may be useful in making decision to patient’s hospitalization where the probability of mortality may be more obvious based on the final variable. However, moderate gaps in our knowledge of the predictors of in-hospital mortality suggest further studies aiming at predicting models for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid dehydrogenase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • acid dehydrogenase and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and loss function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome complication and logistic model: 1, 2
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome complication and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome complication and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • acute renal failure and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute renal failure and liver injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute renal failure and logistic model: 1
    • acute renal failure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute renal failure and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute renal failure and logistic regression model: 1
    • acute renal failure and loss function: 1, 2, 3