Author: Moriarty, Yvonne; Lau, Mandy; Sewell, Bernadette; Trubey, Rob; Quinn-Scoggins, Harriet; Owen, Sioned; Padgett, Louise; Kolovou, Vasiliki; Hepburn, Julie; Buckle, Peter; Playle, Rebecca; Townson, Julia; Robling, Michael; Gilbert, Stephanie; Dimitropoulou, Polyxeni; Edwards, Adrian; Mitchell, Caroline; Matthews, Maura; Smits, Stephanie; Wood, Fiona; Neal, Richard D.; Brain, Kate
Title: Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a targeted cancer awareness intervention for adults living in deprived areas of the UK Cord-id: 61q9mev0 Document date: 2021_8_27
ID: 61q9mev0
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Cancer outcomes are poor in socioeconomically deprived communities, with low symptom awareness contributing to prolonged help-seeking and advanced disease. Targeted cancer awareness interventions require evaluation. METHODS: This is a randomised controlled trial involving adults aged 40+ years recruited in community and healthcare settings in deprived areas of South Yorkshire and South-East Wales. Intervention: personalised behavioural advice facilitated by a trained lay advisor. Con
Document: BACKGROUND: Cancer outcomes are poor in socioeconomically deprived communities, with low symptom awareness contributing to prolonged help-seeking and advanced disease. Targeted cancer awareness interventions require evaluation. METHODS: This is a randomised controlled trial involving adults aged 40+ years recruited in community and healthcare settings in deprived areas of South Yorkshire and South-East Wales. Intervention: personalised behavioural advice facilitated by a trained lay advisor. Control: usual care. Follow-up at two weeks and six months post-randomisation. Primary outcome: total cancer symptom recognition score two weeks post-randomisation. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-four participants were randomised. The difference in total symptom recognition at two weeks [adjusted mean difference (AMD) 0.6, 95% CI: −0.03, 1.17, p = 0.06] was not statistically significant. Intervention participants reported increased symptom recognition (AMD 0.8, 95% CI: 0.18, 1.37, p = 0.01) and earlier intended presentation (AMD −2.0, 95% CI: −3.02, −0.91, p < 0.001) at six months. “Lesser known†symptom recognition was higher in the intervention arm (2 weeks AMD 0.5, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.97 and six months AMD 0.7, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.17). Implementation cost per participant was £91.34, with no significant between-group differences in healthcare resource use post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Improved symptom recognition and earlier anticipated presentation occurred at longer-term follow-up. The ABACus Health Check is a viable low-cost intervention to increase cancer awareness in socioeconomically deprived communities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16872545.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date