Author: Dbeibo, Lana; Kuebler, Kari; Keen, Alyson; George, Annie; Kelley, Kristen; Sadowski, Josh; Basham, Laura; Beeson, Terrie; Schmidt, C. Max; Beeler, Cole; Webb, Douglas
Title: Assessment of a universal preprocedural screening program for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Cord-id: 6eauikti Document date: 2021_2_2
ID: 6eauikti
Snippet: OBJECTIVES Study objectives were to: (1) Determine the value of a COVID-19 universal preprocedural screening program; and (2) Using the results of asymptomatic positive screens, determine the safety of resuming elective procedures. DESIGN This was a descriptive study detailing the process and findings from implementation of a COVID-19 universal preprocedural screening program. SETTING An adult academic tertiary center in Indiana. PATIENTS Patients were included in the analysis if they were scree
Document: OBJECTIVES Study objectives were to: (1) Determine the value of a COVID-19 universal preprocedural screening program; and (2) Using the results of asymptomatic positive screens, determine the safety of resuming elective procedures. DESIGN This was a descriptive study detailing the process and findings from implementation of a COVID-19 universal preprocedural screening program. SETTING An adult academic tertiary center in Indiana. PATIENTS Patients were included in the analysis if they were screened 96 hours prior to or within 24 hours after undergoing a procedure in the operating room, cardiac catheterization lab, or endoscopy. METHODS A report was generated from the electronic health record of patients undergoing procedures from a six week period of time (May 4th-June 14th, 2020). Health records for positive screens were reviewed and classified as symptomatic if they met either criteria: (1) screen performed due to presence of COVID-19 symptoms; (2) documentation of symptoms at the time of the screen. Patients with a positive screen that did not meet symptomatic criteria were classified as asymptomatic. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate frequencies and percentages for the included sample. RESULTS The initial sample included 2,194 patients, comprised of 46 positive and 2,148 negative screens. Out of the 46 patients who had a positive test, 17 were asymptomatic, resulting in an asymptomatic rate of 0.79% (17/2165). CONCLUSION Findings validated the value of the program through identification of a low rate of asymptomatic positive screens and procedural team adoption and sustainment. Findings may help inform decision making of like organizations attempting to enhance safety while resuming elective procedures.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute respiratory syndrome and additional strain: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and logistical economic: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date