Author: Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Title: Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech Document date: 2019_2_8
ID: nzv96tjh_34
Snippet: We calculated the proportion of paraphasias (i.e. the proportion of semantically related paraphasias per all attempts) for both connected speech and naming tasks. We calculated the proportion of each type of paraphasia on the PNT as: (# paraphasias / (175-no responses)). As the PNT comprises only objects (nouns), we wanted to provide a comparable calculation for the connected speech task. We determined that the majority of paraphasias replaced no.....
Document: We calculated the proportion of paraphasias (i.e. the proportion of semantically related paraphasias per all attempts) for both connected speech and naming tasks. We calculated the proportion of each type of paraphasia on the PNT as: (# paraphasias / (175-no responses)). As the PNT comprises only objects (nouns), we wanted to provide a comparable calculation for the connected speech task. We determined that the majority of paraphasias replaced noun targets (Supplementary Table 1) , and we therefore calculated the proportion of each type of paraphasia on the connected speech tasks as: (# paraphasias / total number of nouns).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- connected speech and paraphasia type proportion: 1
- connected speech task and paraphasia type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date