Author: Woyessa, Ashenafi Habte; Oluma, Adugna; Palanichamy, Thanasekaran; Kebede, Birtukan; Abdissa, Eba; Labata, Busha Gamachu; Alemu, Tamirat; Assefa, Lamessa
Title: Predictors of Health-Care Workers’ Unwillingness to Continue Working During the Peak of COVID-19 in Western Ethiopia: An Extended Parallel-Process Model Study Cord-id: aomb8vpm Document date: 2021_3_17
ID: aomb8vpm
Snippet: PURPOSE: Willingness to work in disasters is context-specific and corresponds to the nature, magnitude, and threats posed by a particular public health emergency. None us is certain that our health professionals will continue to provide service should the COVID-19 pandemic crisis climb to its worst level. It was with this uncertainty in mind that this study was done to assess predictors of the unwillingness of health-care workers (HCWs) to continue providing their professional services during th
Document: PURPOSE: Willingness to work in disasters is context-specific and corresponds to the nature, magnitude, and threats posed by a particular public health emergency. None us is certain that our health professionals will continue to provide service should the COVID-19 pandemic crisis climb to its worst level. It was with this uncertainty in mind that this study was done to assess predictors of the unwillingness of health-care workers (HCWs) to continue providing their professional services during the climax of the COVID-19 crisis. METHODS: This was a facility-based descriptive cross-sectional study undertaken among 633 HCWsin western Ethiopia. RESULTS: Overall, 205 (32.4%) providers said that they would be unwilling to continue work if COVID-19 peaked. Of these, 176 (27.9%) respondents reported that they would stop going in to work before they were at greatest risk. Statistical analysis performed to predict HCWs unwillingness’ to continue work at peak COVID-19 showed male sex (AOR 11.4, 95% CI 8.32–12.6), younger age (AOR 25.3, 95% CI 4.61–40.67), lack of experience in handling similar pandemics (AOR 5.15, 95% CI 1.1–255), and low perceived level of hospital preparedness (AOR 2.05, 95% CI 0.80–5.21) were predictors of unwillingness. In accordance with the extended parallel-process model, higher threat perception (P≤0.001) and low efficacy perception (P≤0.040) were associated with unwillingness of the HCWs to continue working. CONCLUSION: The proportion of HCWs unwilling to continue their job during COVID-19 is sufficient to affect efforts tof fight the pandemic. As the question of whether our HCWs must risk themselves to treat COVID-19 patients does not have a uniform answer, working on predictors of potential unwillingness is of paramount importance.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- live dependent and low income: 1
- local language and low income: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and low ability: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- logistic regression and low efficacy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- logistic regression and low efficacy perception: 1
- logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- logistic regression and low income country: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression and low perceive: 1
- logistic regression and low response: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- logistic regression and low response efficacy: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date