Author: Lee, S. G.; Fralick, M.; Tang, G.; Tse, B.; Baumann Kreuziger, L.; Cushman, M.; Juni, P.; Sholzberg, M.
Title: Coronavirus-19 and coagulopathy: A Systematic Review Cord-id: 7oti3fg4 Document date: 2021_1_6
ID: 7oti3fg4
Snippet: Background: Understanding the association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and coagulopathy may assist clinical prognostication, and influence treatment and outcomes. We aimed to systematically describe the relationship between hemostatic laboratory parameters and important clinical outcomes among adults with COVID-19. Methods: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials, observational studies and case series published in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1, 20
Document: Background: Understanding the association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and coagulopathy may assist clinical prognostication, and influence treatment and outcomes. We aimed to systematically describe the relationship between hemostatic laboratory parameters and important clinical outcomes among adults with COVID-19. Methods: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials, observational studies and case series published in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1, 2019 to March 25, 2020. Studies of adult patients with COVID-19 that reported at least one hemostatic laboratory parameter were included. Results: Data were extracted from 57 studies (N=12,050 patients) that met inclusion criteria. The average age of patients was 52 years and 45% were women. Of the included studies, 92.7% (N=38/41 studies) reported an average platelet count greater than or equal to 150 x 109/L, 68.2% (N=15/22 studies) reported an average prothrombin time (PT) between 11-14 s, 55% (N=11/20 studies) reported an average activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) between 25-35 s, and 34.4% (N=11/32 studies) reported a D-dimer concentration above the upper limit of normal (ULN). Eight studies (7 cohorts and 1 case series) reported hemostatic lab values for survivors versus non-survivors. Among non-survivors, D-dimer concentrations were reported in 4 studies and all reported an average above the ULN. Interpretation: Most patients had a normal platelet count, elevated D-dimer, PT and aPTT values in the upper reference interval; D-dimer elevation appeared to correlate with poor outcomes. Further studies are needed to better correlate these hemostatic parameters with the risk of adverse outcomes such as thrombosis and bleeding.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absence presence and lung endothelial: 1
- abstract title and additional article: 1
- abstract title and lmwh weight heparin: 1
- abstract title and low molecular lmwh weight heparin: 1
- lmwh weight heparin and low molecular lmwh weight heparin: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- lmwh weight heparin and low molecular lmwh weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- lmwh weight heparin and lung endothelial: 1
- low molecular lmwh weight heparin and lung endothelial: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date