Author: Gelardi, Matteo; Fiore, Valeria; Giancaspro, Rossana; La Gatta, Emanuel; Fortunato, Francesca; Resta, Onofrio; Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana; Santomasi, Carla; Dimitri, Michela; Foschino Barbaro, Maria Pia; Lacedonia, Donato; Scioscia, Giulia; Laricchiuta, Antonio; Cassano, Michele
                    Title: Surgical Mask and N95 in Healthcare Workers of Covid-19 Departments: Clinical and Social Aspects  Cord-id: 7ze0vm5n  Document date: 2020_11_10
                    ID: 7ze0vm5n
                    
                    Snippet: INTRODUTION. In order to prevent or slow down the transmission of COVID-19, various public health measures have been introduced, including social distancing, environmental disinfection and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). In this perspective, the clinical practice of healthcare professionals has changed dramatically. As a matter of fact, the use of surgical masks and N95 has significantly worsened the job performance of workers who deal directly with COVID-19 disease. METHODS. The
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: INTRODUTION. In order to prevent or slow down the transmission of COVID-19, various public health measures have been introduced, including social distancing, environmental disinfection and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). In this perspective, the clinical practice of healthcare professionals has changed dramatically. As a matter of fact, the use of surgical masks and N95 has significantly worsened the job performance of workers who deal directly with COVID-19 disease. METHODS. The study included 116 health workers employed in the pulmonology, intensive care and infectious diseases departments of Bari and Foggia Hospital, directly involved in the healthcare of patients affected by COVID-19. Between May 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020, each participant completed an online questionnaire aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workers’ lifestyle changes and job performances. We compared the results based on the type of mask used by each participant (surgical mask vs N95). RESULTS. Although disturbances related to the use of the mask arose earlier in subjects who wore the N95 (p = 0.0094), healthcare workers that wore surgical masks reported a statistically higher average score for a greater number of disorders. CONCLUSIONS. This is the first study that compares the effects of the two most used PPE on the quality of life of health workers and which highlights the greater discomfort caused by surgical masks. This result brings to light a serious social problem, being surgical masks widely used in everyday life by ordinary people and non-healthcare workers. (www.actabiomedica.it)
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- activity type and acute distress respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  - activity type and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
  - activity type and acute respiratory sars syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
  - acute distress and adequate ppe: 1
  - acute distress and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
  - acute distress and low safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  - acute distress respiratory syndrome and adequate ppe: 1
  - acute distress respiratory syndrome and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
  - acute distress respiratory syndrome and low safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  - acute respiratory and adequate ppe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
  - acute respiratory and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
  - acute respiratory and logistic regression model evaluate: 1
  - acute respiratory and low protection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
  - acute respiratory and low safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
  - acute respiratory sars syndrome and adequate ppe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
  - acute respiratory sars syndrome and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61
  - acute respiratory sars syndrome and logistic regression model evaluate: 1
  - acute respiratory sars syndrome and low protection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
  - acute respiratory sars syndrome and low safety: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
  
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date