Selected article for: "logistic regression and lymphocyte ratio group"

Author: Bai, Yang; Wang, Enxin; Zhao, Shoujie; Li, Jing; Zhu, Yejing; Zhang, Yongchao; Cao, Liang; Liu, Haitao; Dong, Yushu; Wang, Fang; Liang, Guobiao; Liu, Lei
Title: Implications of Laboratory Tests in Disease Grading and Death Risk Stratification of COVID-19: A Retrospective Study in Wuhan, China
  • Cord-id: 3oblbia9
  • Document date: 2021_2_19
  • ID: 3oblbia9
    Snippet: Background: Although laboratory tests have become an indispensable part in clinical practice, its application in severity classification and death risk stratification of COVID-19 remains unvalidated. This study aims to explore the significance of laboratory tests in the management of COVID-19. Methods: In 3,342 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, those of mild or moderate subtype were categorized into the non-severe group, while those of severe or critical subtype were categorized into the seve
    Document: Background: Although laboratory tests have become an indispensable part in clinical practice, its application in severity classification and death risk stratification of COVID-19 remains unvalidated. This study aims to explore the significance of laboratory tests in the management of COVID-19. Methods: In 3,342 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, those of mild or moderate subtype were categorized into the non-severe group, while those of severe or critical subtype were categorized into the severe group. Initial laboratory data were analyzed and compared according to disease severity and outcome. Diagnostic models for the severe group were generated on risk factors identified by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Cox regression and ROC analyses on risk factors were utilized to construct prognostic models. Results: In identification of patients in the severe group, while age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase were identified as independent predictors, the value of combination of them appears modest [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.694]. Further ROC analyses indicated that among patients in the severe group, laboratory indices had a favorable value in identifying patients of critical subtype rather than severe subtype. For death outcome, IL-6, co-existing cerebrovascular disease, prothrombin time activity, and urea nitrogen were independent risk factors. An IL-6 single-parameter model was finalized for distinguishing between fatal and recovered individuals (AUC = 0.953). Finally, a modified death risk stratification strategy based on clinical severity and IL-6 levels enables more identification of non-survivors in patients with non-critical disease. Conclusions: Laboratory screening provides a useful tool for COVID-19 management in identifying patients with critical condition and stratifying risk levels of death.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal kidney admission function and liver function: 1
    • abnormal kidney admission function and liver injury: 1
    • abnormal kidney and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • abnormal kidney and admission function: 1, 2
    • abnormal kidney and liver damage: 1
    • abnormal kidney and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abnormal kidney and liver injury: 1, 2
    • abnormal kidney and log rank test kaplan meier method: 1
    • abnormal kidney and logistic analysis: 1
    • abnormal kidney and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abnormal kidney and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission function: 1, 2
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver damage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and log rank test kaplan meier method: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25