Selected article for: "los hospitalization and low minimum oxygen saturation"

Author: El Halabi, M.; Feghali, J.; Tallon de Lara, P.; Narasimhan, B.; Ho, K.; Saabeyi, J.; Huang, J.; Osorio, G.; Mathew, J.; Wisnivesky, J.; Steiger, D.
Title: A Novel Evidence-Based Predictor Tool for Hospitalization and Length of Stay: Insights from COVID19 Patients in New York City
  • Cord-id: dpkkue8k
  • Document date: 2021_4_26
  • ID: dpkkue8k
    Snippet: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved into a true global pandemic infecting more than 30 million people worldwide. Predictive models for key outcomes have the potential to optimize resource utilization and patient outcome as outbreaks continue to occur worldwide. We aimed to design and internally validate a web-based calculator predictive of hospitalization and length of stay (LOS) in a large cohort of COVID-19 positive patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) i
    Document: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved into a true global pandemic infecting more than 30 million people worldwide. Predictive models for key outcomes have the potential to optimize resource utilization and patient outcome as outbreaks continue to occur worldwide. We aimed to design and internally validate a web-based calculator predictive of hospitalization and length of stay (LOS) in a large cohort of COVID-19 positive patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) in a New York City health system. Methods The study cohort consisted of consecutive adult (>18 years) patients presenting to the ED of one of the Mount Sinai Health System hospitals between March, 2020 and April, 2020 who were diagnosed with COVID-19. Logistic regression was utilized to construct predictive models for hospitalization and prolonged (>3 days) LOS. Discrimination was evaluated using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Internal validation with bootstrapping was performed, and a web-based calculator was implemented. Results The cohort consisted of 5859 patients with a hospitalization rate of 65% and a prolonged LOS rate of 75% among hospitalized patients. Independent predictors of hospitalization included older age (OR=6.29; 95% CI [1.83-2.63], >65 vs. 18-44), male sex (OR=1.35 [1.17-1.55]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=1.74; [1.00-3.03]), hypertension (OR=1.39; [1.13-1.70]), diabetes (OR=1.45; [1.16-1.81]), chronic kidney disease (OR=1.69; [1.23-2.32]), elevated maximum temperature (OR=4.98; [4.28-5.79]), and low minimum oxygen saturation (OR=13.40; [10.59-16.96]). Predictors of extended LOS included older age (OR=1.03 [1.02-1.04], per year), chronic kidney disease (OR=1.91 [1.35-2.71]), elevated maximum temperature (OR=2.91 [2.40-3.53]), and low minimum percent oxygen saturation (OR=3.89 [3.16-4.79]). AUCs of 0.881 and 0.770 were achieved for hospitalization and LOS, respectively. A calculator was made available under the following URL: https://covid19-outcome-prediction.shinyapps.io/COVID19_Hospitalization_Calculator/ Conclusion The prediction tool derived from this study can be used to optimize resource allocation, guide quality of care, and assist in designing future studies on the triage and management of patients with COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal chest imaging and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • abnormal chest imaging and logistic regression model: 1
    • actively follow and logistic regression: 1
    • acute hospital and additional study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute hospital and adequate calibration: 1
    • acute hospital and adjusted number: 1, 2
    • acute hospital and admission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • acute hospital and admission require: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute hospital and admission risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute hospital and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute hospital and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • additional study and adjusted number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • additional study and admission rate: 1, 2
    • additional study and admission require: 1
    • additional study and admission risk: 1, 2, 3
    • additional study and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • adequate calibration and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • adequate calibration and logistic regression model: 1
    • adjusted number and admission rate: 1