Selected article for: "limited time frame and time frame"

Author: Olsho, Alexis; Brahmia, Suzanne White; Smith, Trevor; Zimmerman, Charlotte; Boudreaux, Andrew; Eaton, Philip
Title: Online administration of a reasoning inventory in development
  • Cord-id: 7pvy9rd0
  • Document date: 2020_7_16
  • ID: 7pvy9rd0
    Snippet: We are developing a new research based assessment (RBA) focused on quantitative reasoning -- rather than conceptual understanding -- in physics contexts. We rapidly moved administration of the RBA online in Spring 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We present our experiences with online, unproctored administration of an RBA in development to students enrolled in a large-enrollment, calculus-based, introductory physics course. We describe our attempts to adhere to best practices on a limited time
    Document: We are developing a new research based assessment (RBA) focused on quantitative reasoning -- rather than conceptual understanding -- in physics contexts. We rapidly moved administration of the RBA online in Spring 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We present our experiences with online, unproctored administration of an RBA in development to students enrolled in a large-enrollment, calculus-based, introductory physics course. We describe our attempts to adhere to best practices on a limited time frame, and present a preliminary analysis of the results, comparing results from the online administration to earlier results from in-person, proctored administration. We include discussion of online administration of multiple-choice/multiple-response (MCMR) items, which we use on the instrument as a way to probe multiple facets of student reasoning. Our initial comparison indicates little difference between online and paper administrations of the RBA, consistent with previous work by other researchers.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date