Selected article for: "exponential model and regression model"

Author: Made, Felix; Utembe, Wells; Wilson, Kerry; Naicker, Nisha; Tlotleng, Nonhlanhla; Mdleleni, Simbulele; Mazibuko, Lusanda; Ntlebi, Vusi; Ngwepe, Phuti
Title: Impact of level five lockdown on the incidence of COVID-19: lessons learned from South Africa
  • Cord-id: g77d8vy8
  • Document date: 2021_6_23
  • ID: g77d8vy8
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: the level five (L5) lockdown was a very stringent social distancing measure taken to reduce the spread of COVID-19 infections. This study assessed the impact of the L5 lockdown and its association with the incidence of COVID-19 cases in South Africa (SA). METHODS: data was obtained from the National Department of Health (NDoH) from the 5(th) March to the 30(th) April 2020. A basic reproductive number (R0) and a serial interval were used to calculate estimated cases (EC). A double e
    Document: INTRODUCTION: the level five (L5) lockdown was a very stringent social distancing measure taken to reduce the spread of COVID-19 infections. This study assessed the impact of the L5 lockdown and its association with the incidence of COVID-19 cases in South Africa (SA). METHODS: data was obtained from the National Department of Health (NDoH) from the 5(th) March to the 30(th) April 2020. A basic reproductive number (R0) and a serial interval were used to calculate estimated cases (EC). A double exponential smoothing model was used to forecast the number of cases during the L5 lockdown period. A Poisson regression model was fitted to describe the association between L5 lockdown status and incident cases. RESULTS: a total of 5,737 laboratory-confirmed cases (LCC) were reported by 30(th) April 2020, 4,785 (83%) occurred during L5 lockdown. Our model forecasted 30,629 cases of COVID-19 assuming L5 lockdown was not imposed. High incidence rates of COVID-19 were recorded in KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga Provinces during the L5 lockdown compared to the other provinces. Nationally, the incident rate of COVID-19 was 68.00% higher in L5 lockdown than pre-lockdown for LCC. CONCLUSION: the L5 lockdown was very effective in reducing the incidence of COVID-19 cases. However, the incident rates of LCC and EC were higher nationally, and in some provinces during the L5 lockdown.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absence presence and adequate time: 1
    • absence presence and local transmission: 1
    • absence presence and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • actual number and adequate time: 1
    • actual number and local transmission: 1, 2
    • actual number and lockdown assume: 1
    • actual number and lockdown implementation: 1, 2
    • actual number and lockdown implementation period: 1
    • actual number and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • adequate time and lockdown implementation: 1
    • local transmission and lockdown control measure: 1
    • local transmission and lockdown end: 1, 2
    • local transmission and lockdown implementation: 1
    • local transmission and lockdown level: 1, 2