Selected article for: "model performance and sensitivity analysis"

Author: Sangeeta Bhatia; Britta Lassmann; Emily Cohn; Malwina Carrion; Moritz U.G. Kraemer; Mark Herringer; John Brownstein; Larry Madoff; Anne Cori; Pierre Nouvellet
Title: Using Digital Surveillance Tools for Near Real-Time Mapping of the Risk of International Infectious Disease Spread: Ebola as a Case Study
  • Document date: 2019_11_15
  • ID: jwesa12u_131
    Snippet: In this supplement, we present the details of the pre-processing of ProMED and HealthMap feeds (Section 1), the model results using ProMED, HealthMap and WHO data and the impact of the datasources and model parameters on the performance of the model. We varied the length of the time window used for model fitting (see Methods for details). SI Sections 2, SI Section 3 and SI Section 4 present the forecasts using ProMED, HealthMap and WHO data respe.....
    Document: In this supplement, we present the details of the pre-processing of ProMED and HealthMap feeds (Section 1), the model results using ProMED, HealthMap and WHO data and the impact of the datasources and model parameters on the performance of the model. We varied the length of the time window used for model fitting (see Methods for details). SI Sections 2, SI Section 3 and SI Section 4 present the forecasts using ProMED, HealthMap and WHO data respectively using different calibration windows (2, 4 and 6 weeks) and forecast horizons (4, 6 and 8 weeks). The model performance was moderately better with shorter calibration windows ( Fig 32) and with WHO data (Fig 33) . We explored the impact of alternate priors for the gravity model parameter on the results from the model. The results of this sensitivity analysis are presented in Section 8. We present additional analysis on the predicting the spatial spread of the epidemic in Section 9.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • calibration window and model datasource: 1
    • calibration window and model performance: 1, 2
    • epidemic spatial spread and gravity model: 1
    • epidemic spatial spread and model performance: 1
    • fitting model and gravity model: 1
    • fitting model and model performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • fitting model and model result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • gravity model and model performance: 1
    • HealthMap ProMED and model performance: 1, 2, 3