Author: Getachew, Emnet; Adebeta, Tsegaye; Gebrie, Desye; Charlie, Loveness; Said, Bibie; Assefa, Dawit Getachew; Wanjiru, Cathrine Lydiah; Zeleke, Eden Dagnachew; Tesfahunei, Hanna Amanuel; Abebe, Mekdelawit; Joseph, Michele; Manyazewal, Tsegahun
Title: Pyrosequencing for diagnosis of multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: A systemic review and meta-analysis Cord-id: 5ju0p0nu Document date: 2021_6_29
ID: 5ju0p0nu
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) pose major threats to global health. Diagnosis accuracy and delay have been the major drivers for the upsurge of M/XDR-TB. Pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a novel, real-time DNA sequencing for rapid detection of mutations associated with M/XDR-TB. We aimed to systematically synthesize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of PSQ for M/XDR-TB. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Biosis, Web of Science
Document: BACKGROUND: Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) pose major threats to global health. Diagnosis accuracy and delay have been the major drivers for the upsurge of M/XDR-TB. Pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a novel, real-time DNA sequencing for rapid detection of mutations associated with M/XDR-TB. We aimed to systematically synthesize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of PSQ for M/XDR-TB. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Biosis, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to March 2020. We used the QUADASâ€2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool to assess the quality of studies, the BRMA (bivariate randomâ€effects meta-analysis) model to synthesize diagnostic accuracies, and the Rev-Man 5.4 software to perform the meta-analyses. We analyzed dichotomous data using the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42020200817. RESULTS: The analysis included seven studies, with a total sample of 3,165. At 95% confidence interval, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of PSQ were 89.7 (CI: 83.5–93.8) and 97.8 (CI: 94.9–99.1) for Isoniazid, 94.6 (CI: 90.9–96.8) and 98.5 (CI: 96.5–99.3) for Rifampicin, 87.9 (CI: 81.2–92.4) and 98.8 (CI: 97.2–99.5) for Fluoroquinolone, 83.5 (CI: 72.8–90.5) and 99.4 (CI: 98.3–99.8) for Amikacin, 79 (CI: 67–8-87) and 97.9 (CI: 95.5–99) for Capreomycin, and 69.6 (CI: 57–79.8) and 98.2 (CI: 95.9–99.2) for Kanamycin. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 85.8 (CI: 76.7–91.7) and 98.5 (CI: 96.5–99.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the pooled data, PSQ is highly sensitive and specific for detecting M/XDR-TB, both from clinical specimens and culture isolates, and within a shorter turnaround time. We suggest a continued synthesis of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness and technical feasibilities of PSQ in low-income countries context, including sub-Saharan Africa.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absence presence and accuracy studies: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absence presence and accurate rapid: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absence presence and accurate rapid diagnosis: 1, 2
- absence presence and adequate study: 1
- absence presence and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- absence presence and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- abstract title and accuracy studies: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- abstract title and additional analysis: 1
- abstract title and low concern: 1
- abstract title and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- abstract title and low income country: 1, 2
- abstract title and low sensitivity: 1, 2
- accuracy estimate and low concern: 1
- accuracy estimate and low sensitivity: 1
- accuracy studies and additional analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy studies and low concern: 1
- accuracy studies and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy studies and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- accurate rapid and additional analysis: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date