Author: de Terwangne, Christophe; Laouni, Jabber; Jouffe, Lionel; Lechien, Jerome R.; Bouillon, Vincent; Place, Sammy; Capulzini, Lucio; Machayekhi, Shahram; Ceccarelli, Antonia; Saussez, Sven; Sorgente, Antonio
Title: Predictive Accuracy of COVID-19 World Health Organization (WHO) Severity Classification and Comparison with a Bayesian-Method-Based Severity Score (EPI-SCORE) Cord-id: 8kiwtxk1 Document date: 2020_10_24
ID: 8kiwtxk1
Snippet: Objectives: Assess the predictive accuracy of the WHO COVID-19 severity classification on COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The secondary aim was to compare its predictive power with a new prediction model, named COVID-19 EPI-SCORE, based on a Bayesian network analysis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a population of 295 COVID-19 RT-PCR positive patients hospitalized at Epicura Hospital Center, Belgium, admitted between March 1st and April 30th, 2020. Results: Our cohort’s median age was 73
Document: Objectives: Assess the predictive accuracy of the WHO COVID-19 severity classification on COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The secondary aim was to compare its predictive power with a new prediction model, named COVID-19 EPI-SCORE, based on a Bayesian network analysis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a population of 295 COVID-19 RT-PCR positive patients hospitalized at Epicura Hospital Center, Belgium, admitted between March 1st and April 30th, 2020. Results: Our cohort’s median age was 73 (62–83) years, and the female proportion was 43%. All patients were classified following WHO severity classification at admission. In total, 125 (42.4%) were classified as Moderate, 69 (23.4%) as Severe, and 101 (34.2%) as Critical. Death proportions through these three classes were 11.2%, 33.3%, and 67.3%, respectively, and the proportions of critically ill patients (dead or needed Invasive Mechanical Ventilation) were 11.2%, 34.8%, and 83.2%, respectively. A Bayesian network analysis was used to create a model to analyze predictive accuracy of the WHO severity classification and to create the EPI-SCORE. The six variables that have been automatically selected by our machine learning algorithm were the WHO severity classification, acute kidney injury, age, Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels (LDH), lymphocytes and activated prothrombin time (aPTT). Receiver Operation Characteristic (ROC) curve indexes hereby obtained were 83.8% and 91% for the models based on WHO classification only and our EPI-SCORE, respectively. Conclusions: Our study shows that the WHO severity classification is reliable in predicting a severe outcome among COVID-19 patients. The addition to this classification of a few clinical and laboratory variables as per our COVID-19 EPI-SCORE has demonstrated to significantly increase its accuracy.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute increase and acute phase: 1
- absolute increase and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- absolute increase and acute sars respiratory distress syndrome: 1
- absolute increase and acute setting: 1
- absolute increase and additional cost: 1
- absolute increase and low frequency: 1
- absolute increase and lymphocyte count: 1, 2
- accuracy increase and acute kidney injury: 1
- accuracy increase and acute renal failure: 1
- accuracy increase and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accuracy increase and low frequency: 1
- accuracy increase and lung imaging: 1, 2
- accurate reliable and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
- accurate reliable and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- accurate reliable and acute setting: 1
- accurate reliable and local ethics committee: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date