Selected article for: "aclf chronic liver failure and liver cirrhosis"

Author: Balcar, Lorenz; Semmler, Georg; Pomej, Katharina; Simbrunner, Benedikt; Bauer, David; Hartl, Lukas; Jachs, Mathias; Paternostro, Rafael; Bucsics, Theresa; Pinter, Matthias; Trauner, Michael; Mandorfer, Mattias; Reiberger, Thomas; Scheiner, Bernhard
Title: Patterns of acute decompensation in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and course of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure
  • Cord-id: ersapcw7
  • Document date: 2021_5_28
  • ID: ersapcw7
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION: Recently, based on data from the PREDICT study, the European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF‐CLIF) consortium proposed pathophysiological/prognostic groups in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: stable decompensated cirrhosis (SDC), unstable decompensated cirrhosis (UDC), pre‐acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (pre‐ACLF), and ACLF. We evaluated the outcomes of these subgroups in a real‐life cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Pat
    Document: INTRODUCTION: Recently, based on data from the PREDICT study, the European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF‐CLIF) consortium proposed pathophysiological/prognostic groups in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: stable decompensated cirrhosis (SDC), unstable decompensated cirrhosis (UDC), pre‐acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (pre‐ACLF), and ACLF. We evaluated the outcomes of these subgroups in a real‐life cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis developing first AD between 09/2010 and 12/2017 at the Vienna General Hospital were evaluated for this retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten patients with cirrhosis (aged 57.6 ± 11.8 years) including n = 45 (21.4%) SDC, n = 100 (47.6%) UDC, n = 28 (13.3%) pre‐ACLF, and n = 37 (17.6%) with ACLF were considered. The proposed AD subgroups discriminated between patients with favorable (1‐year mortality: SDC: 6.7% and UDC: 19.6%) and dismal prognosis (90‐day mortality: pre‐ACLF: 42.9%). Interestingly, systemic inflammation gradually increased (e.g., C‐reactive protein, SDC: 0.9 mg/dl, vs. UDC: 2.0 mg/dl vs. pre‐ACLF: 3.2 mg/dl, p < 0.001) while renal function was progressively deteriorating (creatinine levels, SDC: 0.8 mg/dl vs. UDC: 0.9 mg/dl vs. pre‐ACLF: 1.2 mg/dl, p < 0.001) across prognostic subgroups in patients with cirrhosis. DISCUSSION: The recently proposed pathophysiological/prognostic EF‐CLIF subgroups are also reproduceable in a real‐life cohort of cirrhotic patients. As ACLF is a common and important complication, patients at risk of pre‐ACLF at index AD should be evaluated and if disease proceeds, been treated early and aggressively to avoid excessive mortality.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • aclf decompensated cirrhosis and acute decompensation: 1, 2, 3
    • aclf define and acute decompensation: 1
    • aclf development and acute decompensation: 1, 2
    • aclf grade and acute decompensation: 1
    • aclf patient and acute decompensation: 1
    • aclf specific and acute decompensation: 1, 2