Selected article for: "accurate detection and additional test"

Author: de Vries, R.; Vigeveno, R. M.; Mulder, S.; Farzan, N.; Vintges, D. R.; Goeman, J. J.; Bruisten, S.; van der Corput, B.; Geelhoed, J. J. M.; Visser, L. G.; van der Lubben, M.; Sterk, P. J.; in 't Veen, J. C. C. M.; Groeneveld, G. H.
Title: Ruling out SARS-CoV-2 infection using exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose in a public health setting
  • Cord-id: creqotaz
  • Document date: 2021_2_16
  • ID: creqotaz
    Snippet: Background: Rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is crucial for taking timely measures and minimizing the risk of further SARS-CoV-2 spread. We aimed to assess the accuracy of exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) for the discrimination between individuals with and without a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This was a prospective real-world study of individuals presenting to public test facility for SARS-CoV-2 detection by molecular amplification tests (TMA
    Document: Background: Rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is crucial for taking timely measures and minimizing the risk of further SARS-CoV-2 spread. We aimed to assess the accuracy of exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) for the discrimination between individuals with and without a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This was a prospective real-world study of individuals presenting to public test facility for SARS-CoV-2 detection by molecular amplification tests (TMA or RT-PCR). After sampling of a combined throat/nasopharyngeal swab, breath profiles were obtained using a cloud-connected eNose. Data-analysis involved advanced signal processing and statistics based on independent t-tests followed by linear discriminant and ROC analysis. Data from the training set were tested in a validation, a replication and an asymptomatic set. Findings: For the analysis 4510 individuals were available. In the training set (35 individuals with; 869 without SARS-CoV-2), the eNose sensors were combined into a composite biomarker with a ROC-AUC of 0.947 (CI:0.928-0.967). These results were confirmed in the validation set (0.957; CI:0.942-0.971, n=904) and externally validated in the replication set (0.937; CI:0.926-0.947, n=1948) and the asymptomatic set (0.909; CI:0.879-0.938, n=754). Selecting a cut-off value of 0.30 in the training set resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 100/78, >99/84, 98/82% in the validation, replication and asymptomatic set, respectively. Interpretation: eNose represents a quick and non-invasive method to reliably rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection in public health test facilities and can be used as a screening test to define who needs an additional confirmation test. Funding: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1