Author: Della Valle, Paola; Fabbri, Marco; Madotto, Fabiana; Ferrara, Pietro; Cozzolino, Paolo; Calabretto, Elisabetta; D’Orso, Marco Italo; Longhi, Ermanno; Polosa, Riccardo; Riva, Michele Augusto; Mazzaglia, Giampiero; Sommese, Carmen; Mantovani, Lorenzo Giovanni
Title: Occupational Exposure in the Lombardy Region (Italy) to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results from the MUSTANG–OCCUPATION–COVID-19 Study Cord-id: 7vhm6df8 Document date: 2021_3_4
ID: 7vhm6df8
Snippet: Sero-epidemiological surveys are valuable attempts to estimate the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in general or selected populations. Within this context, a prospective observational study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in different categories of workers and factors associated with positivity, through the detection of virus-specific immunoglobulin G and M (IgG/IgM) in serum samples. Enrollees were divided in low exposure and medium-high groups on the
Document: Sero-epidemiological surveys are valuable attempts to estimate the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in general or selected populations. Within this context, a prospective observational study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in different categories of workers and factors associated with positivity, through the detection of virus-specific immunoglobulin G and M (IgG/IgM) in serum samples. Enrollees were divided in low exposure and medium-high groups on the basis of their work activity. Antibody responders were re-contacted after 3 months for the follow-up. Of 2255 sampled workers, 4.8% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies, with 81.7% to IgG only. Workers who continued to go to their place of work, were healthcare workers, or experienced at least one COVID-19-related symptom were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies prevalence was significantly higher in the medium-high risk vs. low-risk group (7.2% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.0001). At 3-month follow-up, 81.3% of subjects still had antibody response. This study provided important information of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence among workers in northern Italy, where the impact of COVID-19 was particularly intense. The presented surveillance data give a contribution to refine current estimates of the disease burden expected from the SARS-CoV-2.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- academic institution and lockdown period: 1
- academic institution and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- academic institution and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- active disease and lockdown period: 1
- active disease and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- active disease and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- actual circulation and logistic regression: 1, 2
- actual circulation and logistic regression analysis: 1
- local availability and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- lockdown measure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- lockdown period and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- lockdown restriction and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date