Selected article for: "Emergency department and low income"

Author: Dalton, Jarrod E.; Gunzler, Douglas D.; Jain, Vardhmaan; Perzynski, Adam T.; Dawson, Neal V.; Einstadter, Douglas; Tarabichi, Yasir; Imrey, Peter B.; Lewis, Michael; Kattan, Michael W.; Yao, James; Taksler, Glen; Berg, Kristen A.; Krieger, Nikolas I.; Kaelber, David; Jehi, Lara; Kalra, Ankur
Title: Mechanisms of socioeconomic differences in COVID-19 screening and hospitalizations
  • Cord-id: gkxykba1
  • Document date: 2021_8_5
  • ID: gkxykba1
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Social and ecological differences in early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic screening and outcomes have been documented, but the means by which these differences have arisen are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To characterize socioeconomic and chronic disease-related mechanisms underlying these differences. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient and emergency care. PATIENTS: 12900 Cleveland Clinic Health System patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 testing between March 17 and April 1
    Document: BACKGROUND: Social and ecological differences in early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic screening and outcomes have been documented, but the means by which these differences have arisen are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To characterize socioeconomic and chronic disease-related mechanisms underlying these differences. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient and emergency care. PATIENTS: 12900 Cleveland Clinic Health System patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 testing between March 17 and April 15, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Nasopharyngeal PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. MEASUREMENTS: Test location (emergency department, ED, vs. outpatient care), COVID-19 symptoms, test positivity and hospitalization among positive cases. RESULTS: We identified six classes of symptoms, ranging in test positivity from 3.4% to 23%. Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity was disproportionately represented in the group with highest positivity rates. Non-Hispanic Black patients ranged from 1.81 [95% confidence interval: 0.91–3.59] times (at age 20) to 2.37 [1.54–3.65] times (at age 80) more likely to test positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus than non-Hispanic White patients, while test positivity was not significantly different across the neighborhood income spectrum. Testing in the emergency department (OR: 5.4 [3.9, 7.5]) and cardiovascular disease (OR: 2.5 [1.7, 3.8]) were related to increased risk of hospitalization among the 1247 patients who tested positive. LIMITATIONS: Constraints on availability of test kits forced providers to selectively test for SARS-Cov-2. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black patients and patients from low-income neighborhoods tended toward more severe and prolonged symptom profiles and increased comorbidity burden. These factors were associated with higher rates of testing in the ED. Non-Hispanic Black patients also had higher test positivity rates.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • access lack and adequate access: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • access lack and adequate social distancing: 1, 2
    • access lack and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • access lack and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • access lack and low income community: 1
    • acyclic graph and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • additional patient and adequate access: 1
    • additional patient and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • adequate access and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • adequate access and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • adequate social distancing and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • adequate social distancing and low income: 1, 2
    • living environment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • living environment and low incidence: 1
    • living environment and low income: 1, 2
    • logistic regression and long duration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • logistic regression and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
    • logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low income community: 1