Author: Andrade, Carlos Alexandre Soares; Paz, João Lucas Carvalho; de Melo, Gabriel Simino; Mahrouseh, Nour; Januário, Alessandro Lourenço; Capeletti, Lucas Raineri
Title: Survival rate and peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cord-id: 6fr8o6op Document date: 2021_9_29
ID: 6fr8o6op
Snippet: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the survival rate, success rate, and peri-implant biological changes of immediately loaded dental implants (ILs) placed in type 2 diabetic patients (DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was registered on PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA checklist. The search was performed by the first reviewer in January 2021. The electronic databases used were MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and gray literature. The risk of bias analysis was p
Document: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the survival rate, success rate, and peri-implant biological changes of immediately loaded dental implants (ILs) placed in type 2 diabetic patients (DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was registered on PROSPERO and followed the PRISMA checklist. The search was performed by the first reviewer in January 2021. The electronic databases used were MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO, and gray literature. The risk of bias analysis was performed using an instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: A total of 3566 titles and abstracts were obtained. The qualitative synthesis included 7 studies, while the quantitative synthesis included 5 studies. The meta-analysis of IL in individuals with DM2 compared to nondiabetic individuals showed no significant difference among the groups regarding the survival rate of dental implants (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.96–1.04; p = 0.91; I(2) = 0%), even if the patient had poor glycemic control (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.87–1.33; p = 0.48; I(2) = 70%). Meta-analysis of marginal bone loss in IL compared to conventional loading in DM2 patients also showed no significant difference (mean difference = − 0.08, 95% CI − 0.25–0.08; p = 0.33; I(2) = 83%). CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus does not seem to be a risk factor for immediately loaded implants if the glycemic level is controlled, the oral hygiene is satisfactory, and the technical steps are strictly followed. Clinical relevance Rehabilitation in diabetic individuals is more common due to the highest prevalence of edentulism in this population. It is essential to establish appropriate protocols for loading dental implants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-021-04154-6.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute relative and local infection: 1
- abstract screening and acrylic resin: 1
- abstract screening and livivo scopus: 1
- abstract screening and livivo scopus science: 1
- abstract screening and livivo scopus science web: 1
- abstract screening and long term follow: 1
- abstract title and acrylic resin: 1
- abstract title and livivo scopus: 1
- abstract title and livivo scopus science: 1
- abstract title and livivo scopus science web: 1
- abstract title and long term follow: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date